These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36185343)

  • 1. Do racial disparities exist in a spine surgery practice that serves a predominately minority population? Outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective review.
    Volaski HA; Sharfman ZT; Shah P; Eleswarapu A; Geller DS; Krystal J
    N Am Spine Soc J; 2022 Dec; 12():100171. PubMed ID: 36185343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Black and Hispanic Patients Do Not Stay Longer After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results From an Urban Center Serving a Predominantly Minority Cohort.
    Zvi YS; Sharfman ZT; Loloi J; Seref-Ferlengez Z; Lo Y; Tiwari B; Kim SJ
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Apr; 30(7):329-337. PubMed ID: 35157628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m
    Krüger MT; Naseri Y; Hohenhaus M; Hubbe U; Scholz C; Klingler JH
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Mar; 178():82-85. PubMed ID: 30739072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
    Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effects of Marijuana Use on Lumbar Spinal Fusion.
    Jakoi AM; Kirchner GJ; Kerbel YE; Iorio JA; Khalsa AS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):629-634. PubMed ID: 31770339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion.
    Virdee JS; Nadig A; Anagnostopoulos G; George KJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 31(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 27331649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.
    Katz AD; Mancini N; Karukonda T; Greenwood M; Cote M; Moss IL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):432-441. PubMed ID: 30138253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
    Joseph JR; Smith BW; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E4. PubMed ID: 26424344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Same-day discharge after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a series of 808 cases.
    Eckman WW; Hester L; McMillen M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1806-12. PubMed ID: 24272414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Open Fusions: A Multivariant Analysis.
    Abbasi H; Grant A
    Cureus; 2018 Mar; 10(3):e2288. PubMed ID: 29770280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
    Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kulkarni AG; Bohra H; Dhruv A; Sarraf A; Bassi A; Patil VM
    Indian J Orthop; 2016 Sep; 50(5):464-472. PubMed ID: 27746487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes following spinal fusion using an intraoperative computed tomographic 3D imaging system.
    Xiao R; Miller JA; Sabharwal NC; Lubelski D; Alentado VJ; Healy AT; Mroz TE; Benzel EC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):628-637. PubMed ID: 28291408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
    Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.
    Chang M; Wang L; Yuan S; Tian Y; Zhao Y; Liu X
    Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E73-E86. PubMed ID: 35051154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Yu B; Zhang J; Pan J; Wang Y; Chen Y; Zhao W; Wu D
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 33943023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques: Open TLIF Versus Wiltse MIS TLIF.
    Ge DH; Stekas ND; Varlotta CG; Fischer CR; Petrizzo A; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Errico TJ; Buckland AJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 May; 44(9):E555-E560. PubMed ID: 30325884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.