These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36186167)

  • 1. Switching from Telephone to Web-First Mixed-Mode Data Collection: Results from the Transition into Adulthood Supplement to the US Panel Study of Income Dynamics
    Sastry N; McGonagle KA
    J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 2022 Jul; 185(3):933-954. PubMed ID: 36186167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transitioning to a Mixed-Mode Study Design in a National Household Panel Study: Effects on Fieldwork Outcomes, Sample Composition and Costs.
    McGonagle KA; Sastry N
    Surv Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 17(4):411-427. PubMed ID: 38343563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Experimental Evaluation of an Online Interview Scheduler: Effects on Fieldwork Outcomes.
    McGonagle K; Sastry N
    J Surv Stat Methodol; 2021 Jun; 9(3):412-428. PubMed ID: 34327246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mixing modes in a population-based interview survey: comparison of a sequential and a concurrent mixed-mode design for public health research.
    Mauz E; von der Lippe E; Allen J; Schilling R; Müters S; Hoebel J; Schmich P; Wetzstein M; Kamtsiuris P; Lange C
    Arch Public Health; 2018; 76():8. PubMed ID: 29423220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study.
    Mauz E; Hoffmann R; Houben R; Krause L; Kamtsiuris P; Gößwald A
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e64. PubMed ID: 29506967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study.
    Gundersen DA; Wivagg J; Young WJ; Yan T; Delnevo CD
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e31545. PubMed ID: 34932017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of the COVID-19 crisis on survey fieldwork: Experience and lessons from two major supplements to the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics.
    Sastry N; McGonagle K; Fomby P
    Surv Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 14(2):241-245. PubMed ID: 34093884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survey Breakoffs in a Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview.
    McGonagle KA
    Surv Res Methods; 2013 Jan; 7(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 24307916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mode differences in a mixed-mode health interview survey among adults.
    Hoebel J; von der Lippe E; Lange C; Ziese T
    Arch Public Health; 2014; 72(1):46. PubMed ID: 25810913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixing mixed-mode designs in a national health interview survey: a pilot study to assess the impact on the self-administered questionnaire non-response.
    Braekman E; Drieskens S; Charafeddine R; Demarest S; Berete F; Gisle L; Tafforeau J; Van der Heyden J; Van Hal G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):212. PubMed ID: 31752714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data quality and response distributions in a mixed-mode survey.
    Ofstedal MB; Kézdi G; Couper MP
    Longit Life Course Stud; 2022 May; 13(4):621-646. PubMed ID: 35900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. THE EFFECTS OF A TARGETED "EARLY BIRD" INCENTIVE STRATEGY ON RESPONSE RATES, FIELDWORK EFFORT, AND COSTS IN A NATIONAL PANEL STUDY.
    McGonagle KA; Sastry N; Freedman VA
    J Surv Stat Methodol; 2023 Nov; 11(5):1032-1053. PubMed ID: 38077657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximizing Data Quality using Mode Switching in Mixed-Device Survey Design: Nonresponse Bias and Models of Demographic Behavior.
    Axinn WG; Gatny HH; Wagner J
    Methoden Daten Anal; 2015; 9(2):163-184. PubMed ID: 26865882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a Targeted Sequential Mixed Mode Protocol in a Nationally Representative Panel Study.
    Freedman VA; McGonagle KA; Couper MP
    J Surv Stat Methodol; 2018 Mar; 6(1):98-121. PubMed ID: 29607348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effects of a Delayed Incentive on Response Rates, Response Mode, Data Quality, and Sample Bias in a Nationally Representative Mixed Mode Study.
    McGonagle KA; Freedman VA
    Field methods; 2017 Aug; 29(3):221-237. PubMed ID: 29398975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating Web Survey Mode and Panel Effects in a Nationwide Survey of Alcohol Use.
    ZuWallack R; Jans M; Brassell T; Bailly K; Dayton J; Martinez P; Patterson D; Greenfield TK; Karriker-Jaffe KJ
    J Surv Stat Methodol; 2023 Nov; 11(5):1089-1109. PubMed ID: 38028817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timing the Mode Switch in a Sequential Mixed-Mode Survey: An Experimental Evaluation of the Impact on Final Response Rates, Key Estimates, and Costs.
    Wagner J; Schroeder HM; Piskorowski A; Ursano RJ; Stein MB; Heeringa SG; Colpe LJ
    Soc Sci Comput Rev; 2017; 35(2):262-276. PubMed ID: 28943717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics To Analyze Housing Decisions, Dynamics, and Effects.
    McGonagle K; Sastry N
    Cityscape; 2016; 18(1):185-199. PubMed ID: 27110321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.