These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3618663)

  • 21. Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery.
    Minkoff H; Powderly KR; Chervenak F; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 103(2):387-92. PubMed ID: 14754712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ethical analysis of the intrapartum management of pregnancy complicated by fetal hydrocephalus with macrocephaly.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 3763090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 23059404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. RESPONDING PROFESSIONALLY TO REQUESTS FOR CESAREAN DELIVERY.
    Chervenak F; McCullough L
    Georgian Med News; 2017; (268-269):7-11. PubMed ID: 28820404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):302-5. PubMed ID: 8559543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Repeat cesarean births. Social and psychological issues.
    Lipson JG
    JOGN Nurs; 1984; 13(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 6563200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cesarean section without clinical indication versus vaginal delivery as a paradigmatic model in the discourse of medical setting decisions.
    Demontis R; Pisu S; Pintor M; D'aloja E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1470-5. PubMed ID: 21158491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Informed consent in obstetrics: some special problems.
    Rhoden NK
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):67-88. PubMed ID: 11649917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethical decision-making in obstetrics and gynecology.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    ACOG Tech Bull; 1989 Nov; No. 136():1-7. PubMed ID: 11659205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A serious obligation Sharpening a moral argument.
    Pellegrino ED; Walter JJ; Tauer CA
    Health Prog; 1992 Dec; 73(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11645751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Toward guidelines for compelling cesarean surgery: of rights, responsibility, and decisional authenticity.
    Finer JJ
    Minn Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 76(2):239-94. PubMed ID: 11659551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice.
    Saad A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 88(1):157-8. PubMed ID: 8684752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean.
    Shorten A; Shorten B; Keogh J; West S; Morris J
    Birth; 2005 Dec; 32(4):252-61. PubMed ID: 16336366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.
    Loebel G; Zelop CM; Egan JF; Wax J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 15280132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Informed consent for obstetrics management: a urogynecologic perspective.
    Davila GW
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2001; 12(5):289-91. PubMed ID: 11715992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Court-ordered cesarean section: an analysis of ethical concerns in compelling cases.
    Elkins TE; Andersen HF; Barclay M; Mason T; Bowdler N; Anderson G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 161(1):150-4. PubMed ID: 2750796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patient-choice vaginal delivery?
    Leeman LM; Plante LA
    Ann Fam Med; 2006; 4(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 16735530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trial of labor vs. elective repeat cesarean section. AAFP Task Force on Clinical Policies for Patient Care.
    Am Fam Physician; 1995 Nov; 52(6):1763-5. PubMed ID: 7484686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lives at stake: how to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life.
    Tauer CA
    Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(3):18, 20-27. PubMed ID: 11652082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery?
    Knopoff KA
    Calif Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 79(2):499-540. PubMed ID: 11659841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.