These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36187060)

  • 1. Carbon nanoparticle-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery with left colic artery preservation: a retrospective study.
    Qian M; Yin S; Hu K; Wang Q; Cao W; Liu C; Wang Z; Huang C
    Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2022 Sep; 17(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 36187060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled study with 3-year follow-up results].
    Chen ZZ; Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Wang ZF; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 25(7):604-611. PubMed ID: 35844123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimen extraction for right colon cancer based on propensity score matching: A retrospective cohort study.
    Li XW; Wang CY; Zhang JJ; Ge Z; Lin XH; Hu JH
    Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():102-108. PubMed ID: 31362128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method].
    Xu S; Zhang H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 24(8):698-703. PubMed ID: 34412187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study.
    Tang Q; Zhu Y; Xiong H; Sheng X; Hu Z; Hu H; Huang R; Zhang Q; Yuan Z; Xie L; Gao Z; Wang Y; Wang G; Wang X
    Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():2247-2257. PubMed ID: 33727861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].
    Zhou JJ; Li TG; Lei SL; Chen WD; Liu KJ; Liu B; Yao HL
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 32306607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The feasibility, safety and short-term clinical efficacy of laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer with left colonic artery (LCA) preservation and natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE).
    Ke Z; Zijian D; Hai H; Jin Y; Yuanyi R; Bo Y; Yangchun Z
    BMC Surg; 2022 Aug; 22(1):308. PubMed ID: 35948902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of short-term efficacy analysis of medium-rectal cancer surgery with robotic natural orifice specimen extraction and robotic transabdominal specimen extraction.
    Ye SP; Lu WJ; Liu DN; Yu HX; Wu C; Xu HC; Li TY
    BMC Surg; 2023 Nov; 23(1):336. PubMed ID: 37940918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short- and long-term outcomes as well as anal function of transanal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal cancer resection: a retrospective study with over 5-year follow-up.
    Zhang J; Li W; Li Y; Amin B; Zhang N; Sun Z; Zhu B
    Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2022 Jun; 17(2):344-351. PubMed ID: 35707343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective Study of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery in Resection of Sigmoid and Rectal Tumors.
    Zhao Z; Chen Q; Zheng H; Li J; Zheng S; Zhao E
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Nov; 31(11):1227-1231. PubMed ID: 33164666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study.
    Zhang H; Hu H; Huang R; Guan Z; Zheng M; Xu C; Li Z; Wang Y; Zhang W; Yu L; Jin Y; Tang Q; Wang G; Wang X
    Updates Surg; 2022 Apr; 74(2):599-607. PubMed ID: 34370279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Advantages of organ protection in colorectal tumor specimen collection through natural orifice specimen extraction surgery].
    Guan X; Wang XS
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 25(6):500-504. PubMed ID: 35754214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment.
    Houqiong J; Ziwen W; Chonghan Z; Penghui H; Hongxin Y; Weijie L; Dongning L; Taiyuan L
    Front Surg; 2023; 10():1092128. PubMed ID: 36874472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Short-term efficacy of preservation versus non-preservation of inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic-assisted radical resection for left hemicolon cancer].
    Ge L; Bao MDL; Liu Z; Liang JW; Zheng ZX; Liu Q; Wang XS; Zhou ZX; Zhou HT
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 23(11):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 33212556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional robotic colorectal cancer resection: a propensity score matching study.
    Huang Y; Yu N
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):175. PubMed ID: 38619667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional robotic resection for patients with colorectal neoplasms.
    Li L; Liu K; Li T; Zhou J; Xu S; Yu N; Guo Z; Yao H
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1153751. PubMed ID: 37007091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method
    Tao F; Liu DN; He PH; Luo X; Xu CY; Li TY; Duan JY
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Oct; 15(10):2142-2153. PubMed ID: 37969697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in 3D laparoscopic partial or radical nephrectomy: a preliminary study.
    Zhao Q; Han D; Yang F; Han S; Xing N
    BMC Urol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):123. PubMed ID: 34496814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Anterior Resections for Cancer with Natural Orifice Versus Conventional Specimen Extraction: A Case-Control Study.
    Chang SC; Chen HC; Chen YC; Ke TW; Tsai YY; Wang HM; Fingerhut A; Chen WT
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Aug; 63(8):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 32692072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled study].
    Chen ZZ; Ding ZJ; Wang ZF; Xu SZ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 26(8):768-772. PubMed ID: 37574293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.