These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36188935)

  • 1. Limb Prostheses: Industry 1.0 to 4.0: Perspectives on Technological Advances in Prosthetic Care.
    Raschke SU
    Front Rehabil Sci; 2022; 3():854404. PubMed ID: 36188935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Osseointegrated Prosthetic Implants for People With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(7):1-126. PubMed ID: 31911825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital healthcare technologies: Modern tools to transform prosthetic care.
    Cabrera IA; Pike TC; McKittrick JM; Meyers MA; Rao RR; Lin AY
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Dec; 18(sup1):129-144. PubMed ID: 34644232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Leveraging Digital Technology to Overcome Barriers in the Prosthetic and Orthotic Industry: Evaluation of its Applicability and Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Binedell T; Subburaj K; Wong Y; Blessing LTM
    JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Nov; 7(2):e23827. PubMed ID: 33006946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjustable-Volume Prosthetic Sockets: Market Overview and Value Propositions.
    Klenow TD; Schulz J
    Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2021; 4(2):35208. PubMed ID: 37615005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of body-powered 3D printed partial finger prostheses: a case study.
    Young KJ; Pierce JE; Zuniga JM
    3D Print Med; 2019 May; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 31049828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lower limb prosthetic interfaces: Clinical and technological advancement and potential future direction.
    Safari R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Dec; 44(6):384-401. PubMed ID: 33164655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advances in prosthetic technology: a perspective on ethical considerations for development and clinical translation.
    Gavette H; McDonald CL; Kostick-Quenet K; Mullen A; Najafi B; Finco MG
    Front Rehabil Sci; 2023; 4():1335966. PubMed ID: 38293290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of CAD/CAM technology in prosthetics and orthotics--current clinical models and a view to the future.
    Smith DG; Burgess EM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11440264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.
    Mayo AL; Gould S; Cimino SR; Glasford S; Harvey E; Ratto M; Hitzig SL
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Dec; 46(6):607-613. PubMed ID: 36515905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cyborg beast: a low-cost 3d-printed prosthetic hand for children with upper-limb differences.
    Zuniga J; Katsavelis D; Peck J; Stollberg J; Petrykowski M; Carson A; Fernandez C
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Jan; 8():10. PubMed ID: 25601104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A survey on what Australians with upper limb difference want in a prosthesis: justification for using soft robotics and additive manufacturing for customized prosthetic hands.
    Stephens-Fripp B; Jean Walker M; Goddard E; Alici G
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Apr; 15(3):342-349. PubMed ID: 30856031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical and technological advances in the management of upper limb amputees.
    Geary M; Gaston RG; Loeffler B
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Mar; 103-B(3):430-439. PubMed ID: 33641410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Priorities in lower limb prosthetic service delivery based on an international survey of prosthetists in low- and high-income countries.
    Wyss D; Lindsay S; Cleghorn WL; Andrysek J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 24335154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation into the relationship between paracycling athletes and their prosthetics technology: a proposed design framework.
    Dyer B
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):166-172. PubMed ID: 30689473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technological Advances in Penile Implant Surgery.
    Barnard JT; Cakir OO; Ralph D; Yafi FA
    J Sex Med; 2021 Jul; 18(7):1158-1166. PubMed ID: 34183291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A narrative review: current upper limb prosthetic options and design.
    Trent L; Intintoli M; Prigge P; Bollinger C; Walters LS; Conyers D; Miguelez J; Ryan T
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Aug; 15(6):604-613. PubMed ID: 30973275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of environmental and personal factors on participation of lower-limb prosthetic users in low-income countries: prosthetists' perspectives.
    Kam S; Kent M; Khodaverdian A; Daiter L; Njelesani J; Cameron D; Andrysek J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2015 May; 10(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 24694038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New technologies applied to canine limb prostheses: A review.
    Arauz PG; Chiriboga P; García MG; Kao I; Díaz EA
    Vet World; 2021 Oct; 14(10):2793-2802. PubMed ID: 34903941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of bone-anchored prostheses using osseointegrated fixation: Myth or reality?
    Frossard LA; Merlo G; Burkett B; Quincey T; Berg D
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Jun; 42(3):318-327. PubMed ID: 29119860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.