164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36189475)
1. Penalized Spline-Involved Tree-based (PenSIT) Learning for estimating an optimal dynamic treatment regime using observational data.
Speth KA; Elliott MR; Marquez JL; Wang L
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2338-2351. PubMed ID: 36189475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Restricted sub-tree learning to estimate an optimal dynamic treatment regime using observational data.
Speth K; Wang L
Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(26):5796-5812. PubMed ID: 34340264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiobjective tree-based reinforcement learning for estimating tolerant dynamic treatment regimes.
Song Y; Wang L
Biometrics; 2024 Jan; 80(1):. PubMed ID: 38364801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extensions of the penalized spline of propensity prediction method of imputation.
Zhang G; Little R
Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):911-8. PubMed ID: 19053998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. HIGH-DIMENSIONAL A-LEARNING FOR OPTIMAL DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES.
Shi C; Fan A; Song R; Lu W
Ann Stat; 2018 Jun; 46(3):925-957. PubMed ID: 29805186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. TREE-BASED REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FOR ESTIMATING OPTIMAL DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES.
Tao Y; Wang L; Almirall D
Ann Appl Stat; 2018 Sep; 12(3):1914-1938. PubMed ID: 30984321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Step-adjusted tree-based reinforcement learning for evaluating nested dynamic treatment regimes using test-and-treat observational data.
Tang M; Wang L; Gorin MA; Taylor JMG
Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(27):6164-6177. PubMed ID: 34490942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adaptive contrast weighted learning for multi-stage multi-treatment decision-making.
Tao Y; Wang L
Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):145-155. PubMed ID: 27213913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Imputation-based Q-learning for optimizing dynamic treatment regimes with right-censored survival outcome.
Lyu L; Cheng Y; Wahed AS
Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3676-3689. PubMed ID: 37129942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using classification tree analysis to generate propensity score weights.
Linden A; Yarnold PR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):703-712. PubMed ID: 28371206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating tree-based dynamic treatment regimes using observational data with restricted treatment sequences.
Zhou N; Wang L; Almirall D
Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2260-2271. PubMed ID: 36063542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using decision lists to construct interpretable and parsimonious treatment regimes.
Zhang Y; Laber EB; Tsiatis A; Davidian M
Biometrics; 2015 Dec; 71(4):895-904. PubMed ID: 26193819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Part I: main content.
Orellana L; Rotnitzky A; Robins JM
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 8. PubMed ID: 21969994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating causal effects for survival (time-to-event) outcomes by combining classification tree analysis and propensity score weighting.
Linden A; Yarnold PR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):380-387. PubMed ID: 29230910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal dynamic treatment regime estimation using information extraction from unstructured clinical text.
Zhou N; Brook RD; Dinov ID; Wang L
Biom J; 2022 Apr; 64(4):805-817. PubMed ID: 35112726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach for Optimizing Dynamic Treatment Regimes.
Murray TA; Yuan Y; Thall PF
J Am Stat Assoc; 2018; 113(523):1255-1267. PubMed ID: 30739965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrating randomized and observational studies to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes.
Batorsky A; Anstrom KJ; Zeng D
Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38804219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the Optimal Personalized Treatment Strategy Based on Selected Variables to Prolong Survival via Random Survival Forest with Weighted Bootstrap.
Shen J; Wang L; Daignault S; Spratt DE; Morgan TM; Taylor JMG
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(2):362-381. PubMed ID: 28934002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust inference on the average treatment effect using the outcome highly adaptive lasso.
Ju C; Benkeser D; van der Laan MJ
Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 31350906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reward ignorant modeling of dynamic treatment regimes.
Wallace MP; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
Biom J; 2018 Sep; 60(5):991-1002. PubMed ID: 29845644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
