These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36191393)

  • 1. MRI in CFD for chronic type B aortic dissection: Ready for prime time?
    Wang Q; Guo X; Brooks M; Chuen J; Poon EKW; Ooi A; Lim RP
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Nov; 150():106138. PubMed ID: 36191393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-modality image-based computational analysis of haemodynamics in aortic dissection.
    Dillon-Murphy D; Noorani A; Nordsletten D; Figueroa CA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Aug; 15(4):857-76. PubMed ID: 26416312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Haemodynamic imaging of thoracic stent-grafts by computational fluid dynamics (CFD): presentation of a patient-specific method combining magnetic resonance imaging and numerical simulations.
    Midulla M; Moreno R; Baali A; Chau M; Negre-Salvayre A; Nicoud F; Pruvo JP; Haulon S; Rousseau H
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Oct; 22(10):2094-102. PubMed ID: 22645039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advanced risk prediction for aortic dissection patients using imaging-based computational flow analysis.
    Zhu Y; Xu XY; Rosendahl U; Pepper J; Mirsadraee S
    Clin Radiol; 2023 Mar; 78(3):e155-e165. PubMed ID: 36610929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting flow in aortic dissection: comparison of computational model with PC-MRI velocity measurements.
    Cheng Z; Juli C; Wood NB; Gibbs RG; Xu XY
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Sep; 36(9):1176-84. PubMed ID: 25070022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fluid-structure interaction simulations of patient-specific aortic dissection.
    Bäumler K; Vedula V; Sailer AM; Seo J; Chiu P; Mistelbauer G; Chan FP; Fischbein MP; Marsden AL; Fleischmann D
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Oct; 19(5):1607-1628. PubMed ID: 31993829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The application of computational modeling for risk prediction in type B aortic dissection.
    Munshi B; Parker LP; Norman PE; Doyle BJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2020 May; 71(5):1789-1801.e3. PubMed ID: 31831314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of intimal flap motion on flow in acute type B aortic dissection by using fluid-structure interaction.
    Chong MY; Gu B; Chan BT; Ong ZC; Xu XY; Lim E
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Dec; 36(12):e3399. PubMed ID: 32862487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computational Study of Anatomical Risk Factors in Idealized Models of Type B Aortic Dissection.
    Ben Ahmed S; Dillon-Murphy D; Figueroa CA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Dec; 52(6):736-745. PubMed ID: 27561609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Haemodynamics in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm according to experimental and numerical approaches: A comparison of PIV, CFD and PC-MRI.
    Li Y; Yoneyama Y; Isoda H; Terada M; Kosugi T; Kosugi T; Zhang M; Ohta M
    Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 32568138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wall Shear Stress Assessment of the False Lumen in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Visualized by 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ex-Vivo Study.
    Veger HTC; Pasveer EH; Westenberg JJM; Wever JJ; van Eps RGS
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2021 Oct; 55(7):696-701. PubMed ID: 34078199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics.
    Isoda H; Ohkura Y; Kosugi T; Hirano M; Alley MT; Bammer R; Pelc NJ; Namba H; Sakahara H
    Neuroradiology; 2010 Oct; 52(10):913-20. PubMed ID: 19967532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Influence of Minor Aortic Branches in Patient-Specific Flow Simulations of Type-B Aortic Dissection.
    Stokes C; Haupt F; Becker D; Muthurangu V; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Balabani S; Díaz-Zuccarini V
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jul; 51(7):1627-1644. PubMed ID: 36967447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of variant arch anatomy with type B aortic dissection and hemodynamic mechanisms.
    Shalhub S; Schäfer M; Hatsukami TS; Sweet MP; Reynolds JJ; Bolster FA; Shin SH; Reece TB; Singh N; Starnes BW; Jazaeri O
    J Vasc Surg; 2018 Dec; 68(6):1640-1648. PubMed ID: 29804742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Using Morphological and Hemodynamic Biomarkers Evaluated from Magnetic Resonance Fluid Dynamics and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
    Perera R; Isoda H; Ishiguro K; Mizuno T; Takehara Y; Terada M; Tanoi C; Naito T; Sakahara H; Hiramatsu H; Namba H; Izumi T; Wakabayashi T; Kosugi T; Onishi Y; Alley M; Komori Y; Ikeda M; Naganawa S
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 Dec; 19(4):333-344. PubMed ID: 31956175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coupled Morphological-Hemodynamic Computational Analysis of Type B Aortic Dissection: A Longitudinal Study.
    Xu H; Piccinelli M; Leshnower BG; Lefieux A; Taylor WR; Veneziani A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Jul; 46(7):927-939. PubMed ID: 29594688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of 4D-Flow MRI spatial resolution on patient-specific CFD simulations of the thoracic aorta.
    Cherry M; Khatir Z; Khan A; Bissell M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15128. PubMed ID: 36068322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI.
    Rispoli VC; Nielsen JF; Nayak KS; Carvalho JL
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Nov; 14():110. PubMed ID: 26611470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elevated Wall Shear Stress in Aortic Type B Dissection May Relate to Retrograde Aortic Type A Dissection: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Pilot Study.
    Osswald A; Karmonik C; Anderson JR; Rengier F; Karck M; Engelke J; Kallenbach K; Kotelis D; Partovi S; Böckler D; Ruhparwar A
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2017 Sep; 54(3):324-330. PubMed ID: 28716447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel MRI-based data fusion methodology for efficient, personalised, compliant simulations of aortic haemodynamics.
    Stokes C; Bonfanti M; Li Z; Xiong J; Chen D; Balabani S; Díaz-Zuccarini V
    J Biomech; 2021 Dec; 129():110793. PubMed ID: 34715606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.