These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36191432)

  • 1. Robust estimation of lumbar joint forces in symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks via large-scale electromyography-driven musculoskeletal models.
    Moya-Esteban A; van der Kooij H; Sartori M
    J Biomech; 2022 Nov; 144():111307. PubMed ID: 36191432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time lumbosacral joint loading estimation in exoskeleton-assisted lifting conditions via electromyography-driven musculoskeletal models.
    Moya-Esteban A; Durandau G; van der Kooij H; Sartori M
    J Biomech; 2023 Aug; 157():111727. PubMed ID: 37499430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hybrid musculoskeletal model-based 3D asymmetric lifting prediction and comparison with symmetric lifting.
    Xiang Y; Zaman R; Arefeen A; Quarnstrom J; Rakshit R; Yang J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2023 Jun; 237(6):770-781. PubMed ID: 37139889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating lumbar spine loading when using back-support exoskeletons in lifting tasks.
    Madinei S; Nussbaum MA
    J Biomech; 2023 Jan; 147():111439. PubMed ID: 36638578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subject-specific regression equations to estimate lower spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric static lifting.
    Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; El Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109550. PubMed ID: 31932024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electromyography-driven musculoskeletal models with time-varying fatigue dynamics improve lumbosacral joint moments during lifting.
    Mohamed Refai MI; Moya-Esteban A; Sartori M
    J Biomech; 2024 Feb; 164():111987. PubMed ID: 38342053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical analysis of different back-supporting exoskeletons regarding musculoskeletal loading during lifting and holding.
    Johns J; Schultes I; Heinrich K; Potthast W; Glitsch U
    J Biomech; 2024 May; 168():112125. PubMed ID: 38688184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of lumbar spine and muscle loading between male and female workers during box transfers.
    Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2018 Nov; 81():76-85. PubMed ID: 30286979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lifting over an obstacle: effects of one-handed lifting and hand support on trunk kinematics and low back loading.
    Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2004 Feb; 37(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 14706328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supporting the upper body with the hand on the thigh reduces back loading during lifting.
    Kingma I; Faber GS; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):881-889. PubMed ID: 26475223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting.
    Gagnon D; Larivière C; Loisel P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Jun; 16(5):359-72. PubMed ID: 11390042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of control strategies for an active back-support exoskeleton on spine loading and kinematics during lifting.
    Koopman AS; Toxiri S; Power V; Kingma I; van Dieën JH; Ortiz J; de Looze MP
    J Biomech; 2019 Jun; 91():14-22. PubMed ID: 31122661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An EMG technique for measuring spinal loading during asymmetric lifting.
    Dolan P; Kingma I; De Looze MP; van Dieen JH; Toussaint HM; Baten CT; Adams MA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001; 16 Suppl 1():S17-24. PubMed ID: 11275339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of lower back muscle force in a lifting task using wearable IMUs.
    Shakourisalim M; Martinez KB; Golabchi A; Tavakoli M; Rouhani H
    J Biomech; 2024 Apr; 167():112077. PubMed ID: 38599020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low back load in airport baggage handlers.
    Koblauch H
    Dan Med J; 2016 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 27034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of low back pain on the kinetics and kinematics of the lumbar spine - a combined in vivo and in silico investigation.
    Firouzabadi A; Arjmand N; Zhang T; Pumberger M; Schmidt H
    J Biomech; 2024 Feb; 164():111954. PubMed ID: 38310006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biomechanical comparison of lifting techniques between subjects with and without chronic low back pain during freestyle lifting and lowering tasks.
    Larivière C; Gagnon D; Loisel P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Feb; 17(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 11832258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim.
    Kim HK; Zhang Y
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 27194401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.