These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36191455)

  • 1. Real-time driving risk assessment using deep learning with XGBoost.
    Shi L; Qian C; Guo F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Dec; 178():106836. PubMed ID: 36191455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction and analysis of likelihood of freeway crash occurrence considering risky driving behavior.
    Ma Y; Zhang J; Lu J; Chen S; Xing G; Feng R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107244. PubMed ID: 37573710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crashes and near-crashes on horizontal curves along rural two-lane highways: Analysis of naturalistic driving data.
    Wang B; Hallmark S; Savolainen P; Dong J
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():163-169. PubMed ID: 29203015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient mapping of crash risk at intersections with connected vehicle data and deep learning models.
    Hu J; Huang MC; Yu X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105665. PubMed ID: 32683130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety critical event prediction through unified analysis of driver and vehicle volatilities: Application of deep learning methods.
    Arvin R; Khattak AJ; Qi H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105949. PubMed ID: 33385957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in frequency of occurrence, event characteristics, and pre-impact vehicle kinematics between crashes, near-crashes, and single vehicle conflicts in a large-scale naturalistic driving study.
    Perez MA; Sudweeks JD; Sears E; Valente J; Guo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 36548218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Class-imbalanced crash prediction based on real-time traffic and weather data: A driving simulator study.
    Elamrani Abou Elassad Z; Mousannif H; Al Moatassime H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 32125890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mid-term prediction of at-fault crash driver frequency using fusion deep learning with city-level traffic violation data.
    Wu YW; Hsu TP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105910. PubMed ID: 33302233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of basic kinematic thresholds in the identification of crash and near-crash events within naturalistic driving data.
    Perez MA; Sudweeks JD; Sears E; Antin J; Lee S; Hankey JM; Dingus TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jun; 103():10-19. PubMed ID: 28371637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Huang E; Megariotis J; Prabahar A; Kashem A; Elzarka A; Haber L; MacKinney T; Loeb H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S89-S96. PubMed ID: 29584473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of high-risk roadway segments for wrong-way driving crash using rare event modeling and data augmentation techniques.
    Ashraf MT; Dey K; Mishra S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106933. PubMed ID: 36577242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Causation analysis of crashes and near crashes using naturalistic driving data.
    Wang X; Liu Q; Guo F; Fang S; Xu X; Chen X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106821. PubMed ID: 36055150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Internal validation of near-crashes in naturalistic driving studies: a continuous and multivariate approach.
    Jonasson JK; Rootzén H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():102-9. PubMed ID: 24144495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Considering real-world sightline obstructions in crash and injury prevention estimates for left turn across path/opposite direction intersection active safety systems.
    Bareiss M; Gabler HC; Sherony R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S102-S106. PubMed ID: 33026259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Maheshwari J; Sarfare S; Chingas G; Thirkill M; Loeb HS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S68-S73. PubMed ID: 34663136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring microscopic driving volatility in naturalistic driving environment prior to involvement in safety critical events-Concept of event-based driving volatility.
    Wali B; Khattak AJ; Karnowski T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105277. PubMed ID: 31514087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-time crash prediction on express managed lanes of Interstate highway with anomaly detection learning.
    Yang S; Abdel-Aty M; Islam Z; Wang D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jun; 201():107568. PubMed ID: 38581772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of failure-caused traffic conflicts as surrogates of rear-end collisions in naturalistic driving studies.
    Tarko AP; Lizarazo CG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105863. PubMed ID: 33189030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How is the duration of distraction related to safety-critical events? Harnessing naturalistic driving data to explore the role of driving instability.
    Ahmad N; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    J Safety Res; 2023 Jun; 85():15-30. PubMed ID: 37330865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the combined effects of driving situations on freeway rear-end crash risk using naturalistic driving study data.
    Wu KK; Wang L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105866. PubMed ID: 33276188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.