These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3619363)

  • 1. [Reinterventions on bioprostheses. Primary tissue deterioration. Experience in 90 cases].
    Chambran P; Roux JP; Gasmi T; Warenbourg H; Watel A; Prat A; Stankowiak C; Soots G
    Ann Chir; 1987; 41(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 3619363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses.
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Valfré C; Talenti E; Guerra F; Thiene G; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Oct; 90(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 4046622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Tissue degeneration of bioprostheses].
    Durán CM; Artiñano E; Nistal F; Gallo I
    Ann Chir; 1987; 41(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 3619365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
    Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of long-term clinical follow-up after aortic or mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc prostheses or tissue valves.
    Mudra H; Kraus F; Wellnhofer E; Hall D; Rudolph W
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():277-81. PubMed ID: 3727700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu-Shiley low-profile pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reece IJ; Fisher J; Sethia B; MacArthur KJ; Wheatley DJ
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():232-6. PubMed ID: 3727691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are valve bioprostheses more prone to structural valve deterioration in mitral than in aortic position? An answer derived from a prolonged experience with the novacor left ventricular assist device.
    Bottio T; Gambino A; Casarotto D; Gerosa G; Thiene G
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2004 Apr; 23(4):507-9. PubMed ID: 15063417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
    Mykén PS
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
    Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Bioprosthesis degeneration in the aortic and mitral valve position. Results and problems from the cardiosurgical viewpoint].
    Antretter H; Cottogni M; Falbesoner C; Furtwängler W; Mair P; Falk M; Hutter J
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1993; 143(11):281-7. PubMed ID: 8212714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve.
    Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reoperation in malfunctioning of valve bioprostheses: surgical technique].
    Pantaleo D; Monaco M; Fimmano A; Iorio D; Covino E; Calandra A; Spampinato N
    Minerva Chir; 1992 Apr; 47(8):803-5. PubMed ID: 1603432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term durability of the pericardial valve.
    Ionescu MI
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():207-12. PubMed ID: 3727688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
    David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Reinterventions on cardiac valve prostheses].
    Dubernet J; Casanegra P; Irarrazaval M; Maturana G; Morán S; Turner E; González JA; Lema G; Urzua J
    Ann Chir; 1987; 41(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 3619354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low profile bioprostheses for mitral valve replacement.
    Romano M; Sigal R; Lorente P; Piwnica A
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():305-7. PubMed ID: 3727708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Porcine aortic vs. bovine pericardial valves: a morphologic study of the Xenomedica and Mitroflow bioprostheses.
    Goffin YA; Bartik MA; Hilbert SL
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():213-22. PubMed ID: 3727689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Replacement of the mitral and aortic valves with bioprostheses. Long-term results].
    Colombo T; Cicardi C; Peronace B; Pozzi M; Gordini V; Pellegrini A
    G Ital Cardiol; 1985 Oct; 15(10):974-82. PubMed ID: 4092917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.