These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36193944)

  • 21. Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.
    Cranor C
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S121-8. PubMed ID: 16030327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Science and regulation: current impasse and future solutions.
    Hoppin PJ; Clapp R
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S8-S12. PubMed ID: 16030343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Handgun violence, public health, and the law.
    Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Drazen JM
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Apr; 358(14):1503-4. PubMed ID: 18354097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An oncology perspective on the Supreme Court's pending decision regarding the Affordable Care Act.
    Stranne SK; Halgren MG
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2012 May; 26(5):426-7, 430. PubMed ID: 22730600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Handguns, health, and the Second Amendment.
    Glantz LH; Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2009 May; 360(22):2360-5. PubMed ID: 19474436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Discovery rule in medical malpractice under the Federal Tort Claims Act: the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Kubrick was not meant to be secondary authority.
    Zajdel C
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 20(2):443-66. PubMed ID: 15239365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When the First Amendment and public health collide: the Court's increasingly strict constitutional scrutiny of health regulations that restrict commercial speech.
    Rauer S
    Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(4):690-712. PubMed ID: 23356100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Supreme Court's Burlington Decision: implications for the health care workplace.
    Spevak C
    Physician Exec; 2007; 33(2):62-4. PubMed ID: 17458385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Supreme Court's influence on medicine and health: the Rehnquist Court, 1986-2005.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2005 Oct; 294(13):1685-7. PubMed ID: 16204668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Why Regulate Guns?
    Siegel RB; Blocher J
    J Law Med Ethics; 2020 Dec; 48(4_suppl):11-16. PubMed ID: 33404299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Coming full circle: a reflection on the Supreme Court's decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
    Toti S
    Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):439-440. PubMed ID: 27639929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 17872560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The right to bear arms: a uniquely American entitlement.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2010 Oct; 304(13):1485-6. PubMed ID: 20924015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gonzales v Raich: the US supreme court's consideration captured the public policy debate about the medical use of marijuana.
    Lorber L
    Gend Med; 2005 Sep; 2(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 16290884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A road map through the supreme court's back alley.
    Forsythe CD; Kehr BN
    Issues Law Med; 2018; 33(2):175-205. PubMed ID: 30831011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Obergefell vs. Hodges Marriage Equality Decision.
    Perone AK
    LGBT Health; 2015 Sep; 2(3):196-9. PubMed ID: 26788668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How Will the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in North Carolina Dental Affect the Regulation of the Professions?
    LeBuhn R
    J Am Coll Dent; 2015; 82(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 26697650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd: implications of the supreme court's decision for the people who matter most...the consumer.
    Jaquette I
    Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(1):97-117. PubMed ID: 17547356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Supreme Court's historic ruling on the Affordable Care Act: economic sustainability and universal coverage.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(6):571-2. PubMed ID: 22772470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Avera Marshall decision. What the Supreme Court's ruling means for hospitals and physicians.
    Struthers M; Knoedler T
    Minn Med; 2015 May; 98(5):29-31. PubMed ID: 26065185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.