These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36195043)

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of printable functionally graded material (FGM) dental implants for different bone densities.
    Ouldyerou A; Mehboob H; Merdji A; Aminallah L; Mehboob A; Mukdadi OM
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Nov; 150():106111. PubMed ID: 36195043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of bone remodeling around hydroxyapatite-coated and novel radial functionally graded dental implants using finite element simulation.
    Jafari B; Katoozian HR; Tahani M; Ashjaee N
    Med Eng Phys; 2022 Apr; 102():103775. PubMed ID: 35346432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of implant diameter, implant-abutment connection type, and bone density on the biomechanical stability of implant components and bone: A finite element analysis study.
    Lee H; Jo M; Sailer I; Noh G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):716-728. PubMed ID: 33685654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Printable functionally graded tibial implant for TAR: FE study comparing implant materials, FGM properties, and implant designs.
    Jyoti ; Ghosh R
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jul; 177():108645. PubMed ID: 38796883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical Analysis of Functionally Graded Root Analog Implants on Alveolar Bone: A 3D Finite Element Study.
    Wang F; Jiang Z; Si P; Lan J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(4):e63-e71. PubMed ID: 34411208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical behavior of functionally graded S53P4 bioglass-zirconia dental implants: Experimental and finite element analyses.
    Fabris D; Fredel MC; Souza JCM; Silva FS; Henriques B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Aug; 120():104565. PubMed ID: 34087536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Associated With Different Implant Designs for Different Bone Densities.
    Leblebicioğlu Kurtuluş I; Kilic K; Bal B; Kilavuz A
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Aug; 31(7):614-622. PubMed ID: 35603892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical performance of Ti-PEEK dental implants in bone: An in-silico analysis.
    Ouldyerou A; Merdji A; Aminallah L; Roy S; Mehboob H; Özcan M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Oct; 134():105422. PubMed ID: 36037710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect Of Tapered And Cylindrical Implants On Stress Distribution In Different Bone Qualities: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Sivrikaya EC; Omezli MM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):e99–e105. PubMed ID: 31184631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of stress characteristics in surrounding bone during insertion of dental implants of three different thread designs: A three-dimensional dynamic finite element study.
    Udomsawat C; Rungsiyakull P; Rungsiyakull C; Khongkhunthian P
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Feb; 5(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 30847230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Oliveira H; Brizuela Velasco A; Ríos-Santos JV; Sánchez Lasheras F; Lemos BF; Gil FJ; Carvalho A; Herrero-Climent M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(13):. PubMed ID: 32630294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone remodeling induced by dental implants of functionally graded materials.
    Lin D; Li Q; Li W; Swain M
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2010 Feb; 92(2):430-8. PubMed ID: 19927332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
    Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the effect of functionally graded materials on bone remodeling around dental implants.
    Rajaeirad M; Fakharifar A; Posti MHZ; Khorsandi M; Watts DC; Elraggal A; Ouldyerou A; Merdji A; Roy S
    Dent Mater; 2024 May; 40(5):858-868. PubMed ID: 38616152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis.
    Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Huang HL; Chen MY; Shen YW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e64-71. PubMed ID: 23527370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. To reduce the maximum stress and the stress shielding effect around a dental implant-bone interface using radial functionally graded biomaterials.
    Asgharzadeh Shirazi H; Ayatollahi MR; Asnafi A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(7):750-759. PubMed ID: 28285545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design of functionally graded dental implant in the presence of cancellous bone.
    Hedia HS
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Oct; 75(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 16025465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of cancellous bone on the functionally graded dental implant concept.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 15912000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.