These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36195043)

  • 21. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Framework Design, Framework Material and Bone Density in the Edentulous Mandible With Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.
    Yu W; Chen S; Ma L; Ma X; Xu X
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):309-317. PubMed ID: 35546271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model With Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis.
    Yazicioglu D; Bayram B; Oguz Y; Cinar D; Uckan S
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 26867093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Osseointegrated Implants Placed in Bone of Different Densities With Cemented Fixed Prosthetic Restoration.
    Chidambaravalli K; Krishnan V
    J Oral Implantol; 2020 Oct; 46(5):480-490. PubMed ID: 32315437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Design optimization of functionally graded dental implant.
    Hedia HS; Mahmoud NA
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15156104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomechanical Behavior of the Dental Implant Macrodesign.
    Lima de Andrade C; Carvalho MA; Bordin D; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28291847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].
    Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Finite element analysis and experimental evaluation on stress distribution and sensitivity of dental implants to assess optimum length and thread pitch.
    Pirmoradian M; Naeeni HA; Firouzbakht M; Toghraie D; Khabaz MK; Darabi R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Apr; 187():105258. PubMed ID: 31830699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigation on primary stability of dental implants through considering peri-implant bone damage, caused by small and large deformations: A validated non-linear micro finite element study.
    Akhlaghi P; Khorshidparast S; Rouhi G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106062. PubMed ID: 37549522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.
    Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
    Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
    Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical behavior analysis of four types of short implants with different placement depths using the finite element method.
    Li R; Wu Z; Chen S; Li X; Wan Q; Xie G; Pei X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):447.e1-447.e10. PubMed ID: 36737356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.
    Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mandibular bone remodeling around osseointegrated functionally graded biomaterial implant using three dimensional finite element model.
    Elleuch S; Jrad H; Wali M; Dammak F
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2023 Sep; 39(9):e3750. PubMed ID: 37403568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Novel and simplified optimisation pathway using response surface and design of experiments methodologies for dental implants based on the stress of the cortical bone.
    Freitas JP; Agostinho Hernandez B; Gonçalves PJP; Baptista EC; Capello Sousa EA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Nov; 235(11):1297-1309. PubMed ID: 34382455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Platform Switched and Sloping Shoulder Implants on Stress Reduction in various Bone Densities: Finite Element Analysis.
    Markose J; Suresh S; Eshwar S; Rekha K; Jain V; Manvi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun; 18(6):510-515. PubMed ID: 28621284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of different impactor designs on biomechanical behavior in the interface bone-implant: A comparative biomechanics study.
    Bachiri A; Djebbar N; Boutabout B; Serier B
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105723. PubMed ID: 32877819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.