224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36195049)
1. The impact of added mass placement on metabolic and temporal-spatial characteristics of transfemoral prosthetic gait.
Ikeda AJ; Hurst EJ; Simon AM; Finucane SB; Hoppe-Ludwig S; Hargrove LJ
Gait Posture; 2022 Oct; 98():240-247. PubMed ID: 36195049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal Spatial and Metabolic Measures of Walking in Highly Functional Individuals With Lower Limb Amputations.
Jarvis HL; Bennett AN; Twiste M; Phillip RD; Etherington J; Baker R
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Jul; 98(7):1389-1399. PubMed ID: 27865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous relative phases of walking with an articulated passive ankle-foot prosthesis in individuals with a unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputation: an explorative case-control study.
Lathouwers E; Baeyens JP; Tassignon B; Gomez F; Cherelle P; Meeusen R; Vanderborght B; De Pauw K
Biomed Eng Online; 2023 Feb; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 36793091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors associated with a risk of prosthetic knee buckling during walking in unilateral transfemoral amputees.
Hisano G; Hashizume S; Kobayashi Y; Murai A; Kobayashi T; Nakashima M; Hobara H
Gait Posture; 2020 Mar; 77():69-74. PubMed ID: 31999980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficacy of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot prototype 4.0 during walking: Physiological determinants.
De Pauw K; Cherelle P; Roelands B; Lefeber D; Meeusen R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):504-510. PubMed ID: 29623812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Walking ability of individuals fitted with transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses: A comparative study of gait parameters.
Ranaldi S; Naaim A; Marchis C; Robert T; Dumas R; Conforto S; Frossard L
Clin Rehabil; 2023 Dec; 37(12):1670-1683. PubMed ID: 37350084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prosthetic gait of unilateral lower-limb amputees with current and novel prostheses: A pilot study.
De Pauw K; Serrien B; Baeyens JP; Cherelle P; De Bock S; Ghillebert J; Bailey SP; Lefeber D; Roelands B; Vanderborght B; Meeusen R
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():59-67. PubMed ID: 31704536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metabolic effects of using a variable impedance prosthetic knee.
Williams MR; Herr H; D'Andrea S
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(6):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 28355031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of the walking speed of individuals with transfemoral amputation from a single prosthetic shank-mounted IMU.
Dauriac B; Bonnet X; Pillet H; Lavaste F
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Sep; 233(9):931-937. PubMed ID: 31218905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.
Ernst M; Altenburg B; Schmalz T; Kannenberg A; Bellmann M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 35090505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transfemoral amputee intact limb loading and compensatory gait mechanics during down slope ambulation and the effect of prosthetic knee mechanisms.
Morgenroth DC; Roland M; Pruziner AL; Czerniecki JM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Jun; 55():65-72. PubMed ID: 29698851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-distance walking effects on trans-tibial amputees compensatory gait patterns and implications on prosthetic designs and training.
Yeung LF; Leung AK; Zhang M; Lee WC
Gait Posture; 2012 Feb; 35(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 22055554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maintaining stable transfemoral amputee gait on level, sloped and simulated uneven conditions in a virtual environment.
Sturk JA; Lemaire ED; Sinitski EH; Dudek NL; Besemann M; Hebert JS; Baddour N
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Apr; 14(3):226-235. PubMed ID: 29276850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of prosthetic mass distribution on the spatiotemporal characteristics and knee kinematics of transfemoral amputee locomotion.
Hekmatfard M; Farahmand F; Ebrahimi I
Gait Posture; 2013 Jan; 37(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 22832472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the Relative Contributions of Active Ankle and Knee Assistance to the Walking Mechanics of Transfemoral Amputees Using a Powered Prosthesis.
Ingraham KA; Fey NP; Simon AM; Hargrove LJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147661. PubMed ID: 26807889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental study of prosthesis modifications based on passive dynamic walking model: A limit cycle stability analysis.
Moradi V; Sanjari MA; Saeedi H; Hajiaghaei B
J Biomech; 2020 May; 104():109743. PubMed ID: 32245539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The comparison of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor- controlled prosthetic knee under different walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
Cao W; Yu H; Zhao W; Meng Q; Chen W
Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):581-592. PubMed ID: 29710741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of push-off and collision work during step-to-step transition in amputees walking at self-selected speed: Effect of amputation level.
Sedran L; Bonnet X; Thomas-Pohl M; Loiret I; Martinet N; Pillet H; Paysant J
J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111943. PubMed ID: 38244403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are Gait Parameters for Through-knee Amputees Different From Matched Transfemoral Amputees?
Schuett DJ; Wyatt MP; Kingsbury T; Thesing N; Dromsky DM; Kuhn KM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Apr; 477(4):821-825. PubMed ID: 30811368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using a microprocessor knee (C-Leg) with appropriate foot transitioned individuals with dysvascular transfemoral amputations to higher performance levels: a longitudinal randomized clinical trial.
Jayaraman C; Mummidisetty CK; Albert MV; Lipschutz R; Hoppe-Ludwig S; Mathur G; Jayaraman A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 34034753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
