148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36195367)
1. Mechanical testing and biomechanical CT analysis to assess vertebral flexion strength of Chinese cadavers.
Feng W; Wei Y; Song F; Li Z; Fu R; Din RU; Li J; Liu W; Liu Y; Yang H
Med Eng Phys; 2022 Oct; 108():103882. PubMed ID: 36195367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental testing and biomechanical CT analysis of Chinese cadaveric vertebrae with different modeling approaches.
Wei Y; Feng W; Li G; Li Z; Liu Z; Cheng X; Yang H
Med Eng Phys; 2021 Jul; 93():8-16. PubMed ID: 34154778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vertebral strength prediction from Bi-Planar dual energy x-ray absorptiometry under anterior compressive force using a finite element model: An in vitro study.
Choisne J; Valiadis JM; Travert C; Kolta S; Roux C; Skalli W
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():190-196. PubMed ID: 30077078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA.
Dall'Ara E; Pahr D; Varga P; Kainberger F; Zysset P
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Feb; 23(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 21344244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-energy estimates of volumetric bone mineral densities in the lumbar spine using quantitative computed tomography better correlate with fracture properties when compared to single-energy BMD outcomes.
Cataño Jimenez S; Saldarriaga S; Chaput CD; Giambini H
Bone; 2020 Jan; 130():115100. PubMed ID: 31678491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Types of vertebral fractures could influence the selection of clinical bone mineral measures to predict biomechanical properties.
Jin Y; Wang Y; Zhang T; Li J; Wong TM; Cheung JPY; Lu WW
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104865. PubMed ID: 34649202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The correlation between osteoporotic vertebrae fracture risk and bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen L; Wu XY; Jin Q; Chen GY; Ma X
Eur Spine J; 2023 Nov; 32(11):3875-3884. PubMed ID: 37740786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Failure strength of human vertebrae: prediction using bone mineral density measured by DXA and bone volume by micro-CT.
Perilli E; Briggs AM; Kantor S; Codrington J; Wark JD; Parkinson IH; Fazzalari NL
Bone; 2012 Jun; 50(6):1416-25. PubMed ID: 22430313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative computed tomography discriminates between postmenopausal women with low spine bone mineral density with vertebral fractures and those with low spine bone mineral density only: the SHATTER study.
Paggiosi MA; Debono M; Walsh JS; Peel NFA; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Apr; 31(4):667-675. PubMed ID: 31993717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analyses of human vertebral bodies embedded in polymethylmethalcrylate or loaded via the hyperelastic intervertebral disc models provide equivalent predictions of experimental strength.
Lu Y; Maquer G; Museyko O; Püschel K; Engelke K; Zysset P; Morlock M; Huber G
J Biomech; 2014 Jul; 47(10):2512-6. PubMed ID: 24818795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining areal DXA bone mineral density and vertebrae postero-anterior width improves the prediction of vertebral strength.
Tatoń G; Rokita E; Wróbel A; Korkosz M
Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Dec; 42(12):1717-25. PubMed ID: 24081424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vertebral bone attenuation on low-dose chest CT: quantitative volumetric analysis for bone fragility assessment.
Kim YW; Kim JH; Yoon SH; Lee JH; Lee CH; Shin CS; Park YS
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):329-338. PubMed ID: 27480628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of incident vertebral fracture using CT-based finite element analysis.
Allaire BT; Lu D; Johannesdottir F; Kopperdahl D; Keaveny TM; Jarraya M; Guermazi A; Bredella MA; Samelson EJ; Kiel DP; Anderson DE; Demissie S; Bouxsein ML
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Feb; 30(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 30306225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A nonlinear finite element model validation study based on a novel experimental technique for inducing anterior wedge-shape fractures in human vertebral bodies in vitro.
Dall'Ara E; Schmidt R; Pahr D; Varga P; Chevalier Y; Patsch J; Kainberger F; Zysset P
J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(12):2374-80. PubMed ID: 20462582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertebral Fracture Risk Thresholds from Phantom-Less Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite Element Modeling Correlate to Phantom-Based Outcomes.
Prado M; Khosla S; Giambini H
J Clin Densitom; 2024; 27(1):101465. PubMed ID: 38183962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative strength of thoracic vertebrae in axial compression versus flexion.
Buckley JM; Kuo CC; Cheng LC; Loo K; Motherway J; Slyfield C; Deviren V; Ames C
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):478-85. PubMed ID: 19364678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.
Crawford RP; Cann CE; Keaveny TM
Bone; 2003 Oct; 33(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 14555280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trabecular structural difference between the superior and inferior regions of the vertebral body: a cadaveric and clinical study.
Shin DE; Lee Y; An HJ; Hwang TS; Cho JW; Oh J; Ahn W; Lee J; Hong CG; Lee Y; Lee S
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1238654. PubMed ID: 37795375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.
Buckley JM; Loo K; Motherway J
Bone; 2007 Mar; 40(3):767-74. PubMed ID: 17174619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
