119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36195664)
1. Don't dodge retraction of fraudulent papers.
DeCoursey TE
Nature; 2022 Oct; 610(7930):34. PubMed ID: 36195664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Refine retraction notices to avoid damaging fallout.
Xu SB; Hu G
Nature; 2023 Feb; 614(7949):624. PubMed ID: 36810885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An analysis of retractions of papers authored by Scott Reuben, Joachim Boldt and Yoshitaka Fujii.
McHugh UM; Yentis SM
Anaesthesia; 2019 Jan; 74(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 30144024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cooperate to stop misconduct.
Qualkenbush L
Nature; 2018 May; 557(7707):637. PubMed ID: 29849159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.
Bosch X
J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retractions are increasing, but not enough.
Oransky I
Nature; 2022 Aug; 608(7921):9. PubMed ID: 35918520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Stop citing fraudulent and duplicate articles].
Maisonneuve H
Presse Med; 2007 May; 36(5 Pt 1):749-52. PubMed ID: 17398065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct. Misconduct by postdocs leads to retraction of papers.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5999):1583. PubMed ID: 20929816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Authors slow to retract 'fraudulent' papers.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 1998 Jun; 393(6684):402. PubMed ID: 9623989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Dana-Farber retractions: meet the blogger who spotted problems in dozens of cancer papers.
Kozlov M
Nature; 2024 Feb; 626(7997):16-17. PubMed ID: 38267558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
Tavare A
BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8212. PubMed ID: 22207043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Many journals have not retracted "fraudulent" research.
Cooper-Mahkorn D
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7148):1850. PubMed ID: 11645074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure.
Unger K; Couzin J
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):40-1. PubMed ID: 16601165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Publication rates after the first retraction for biomedical researchers with multiple retracted publications.
Mistry V; Grey A; Bolland MJ
Account Res; 2019 Jul; 26(5):277-287. PubMed ID: 31025884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis and implications of retraction period and coauthorship of fraudulent publications.
Foo JY; Tan XJ
Account Res; 2014; 21(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 24325213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct and breach of publication ethics: one editor's experience.
Daroff RB
Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 17970250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fraudulent publication.
Flanagin A
Orthop Nurs; 1994; 13(2):7. PubMed ID: 7854817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Federal agencies can do more to ensure correction of the literature when research misconduct is found.
Parrish DM
Account Res; 2018; 25(6):370-372. PubMed ID: 30064271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Research ethics: Zero tolerance.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7380):134-6. PubMed ID: 22237090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
