These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36196544)

  • 21. Hormonal modulation of phonotaxis and advertisement-call preferences in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
    Gordon NM; Gerhardt HC
    Horm Behav; 2009 Jan; 55(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 18926827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differential effects of sound level and temporal structure of calls on phonotaxis by female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor.
    Christie KW; Schul J; Feng AS
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2019 Apr; 205(2):223-238. PubMed ID: 30927060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Species specificity of temporal processing in the auditory midbrain of gray treefrogs: long-interval neurons.
    Hanson JL; Rose GJ; Leary CJ; Graham JA; Alluri RK; Vasquez-Opazo GA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 Jan; 202(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 26614093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs.
    Schul J; Bush SL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Sep; 269(1502):1847-52. PubMed ID: 12350274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lack of phonotactic preferences of female frogs and its consequences for signal evolution.
    Velásquez NA; Valdés JL; Vásquez RA; Penna M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Sep; 118():76-84. PubMed ID: 26051194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Divergence of acoustic signals in a widely distributed frog: relevance of inter-male interactions.
    Velásquez NA; Opazo D; Díaz J; Penna M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87732. PubMed ID: 24489957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spectral preferences and the role of spatial coherence in simultaneous integration in gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Bee MA
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 Nov; 124(4):412-24. PubMed ID: 20853948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms.
    Emerson SB; Boyd SK
    Brain Behav Evol; 1999; 53(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 10343085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multisensory modalities increase working memory for mating signals in a treefrog.
    Zhu B; Zhou Y; Yang Y; Deng K; Wang T; Wang J; Tang Y; Ryan MJ; Cui J
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Jun; 90(6):1455-1465. PubMed ID: 33666233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perception of complex sounds by the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: envelope and fine-structure cues.
    Simmons AM; Buxbaum RC; Mirin MP
    J Comp Physiol A; 1993 Sep; 173(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 8229896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Testing an auditory illusion in frogs: Perceptual restoration or sensory bias?
    Seeba F; Schwartz JJ; Bee MA
    Anim Behav; 2010 Jun; 79(6):1317-1328. PubMed ID: 20514342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Not so cryptic-differences between mating calls of
    Lukanov S
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17574. PubMed ID: 38948235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The dual benefits of synchronized mating signals in a Japanese treefrog: attracting mates and manipulating predators.
    Legett HD; Aihara I; Bernal XE
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Oct; 376(1835):20200340. PubMed ID: 34420389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Female reproductive state influences the auditory midbrain response.
    Miranda JA; Wilczynski W
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2009 Apr; 195(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 19184041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multivariate phenotypic selection on a complex sexual signal.
    Tanner JC; Ward JL; Shaw RG; Bee MA
    Evolution; 2017 Jul; 71(7):1742-1754. PubMed ID: 28474734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.
    Bernal XE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 276(1660):1323-9. PubMed ID: 19141428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advertisement-call modification, male competition and female preference in the bird-voiced treefrog Hyla avivoca.
    Martínez-Rivera CC; Gerhardt HC
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2008; 63(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 19789730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.
    Schrode KM; Bee MA
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Mar; 218(Pt 6):837-48. PubMed ID: 25617467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of geographic heterogeneity in predation pressure on sexual signal divergence in an Amazonian frog species complex.
    Trillo PA; Athanas KA; Goldhill DH; Hoke KL; Funk WC
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 23181745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise.
    Vélez A; Höbel G; Gordon NM; Bee MA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2012 Dec; 198(12):891-904. PubMed ID: 23069882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.