These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36196654)

  • 1. How the public evaluates media representations of uncertain science: An integrated explanatory framework.
    Ratcliff CL; Wicke R
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 May; 32(4):410-427. PubMed ID: 36196654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientists' credibility.
    Jensen JD; Hurley RJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Aug; 21(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 23832155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communicating Uncertain Science to the Public: How Amount and Source of Uncertainty Impact Fatalism, Backlash, and Overload.
    Jensen JD; Pokharel M; Scherr CL; King AJ; Brown N; Jones C
    Risk Anal; 2017 Jan; 37(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 26973157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Communicating Uncertainty on Public Responses to Precision Medicine Research.
    Ratcliff CL; Wong B; Jensen JD; Kaphingst KA
    Ann Behav Med; 2021 Oct; 55(11):1048-1061. PubMed ID: 34297059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility.
    Agley J; Xiao Y; Thompson EE; Golzarri-Arroyo L
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2022 Sep; 11(9):e41747. PubMed ID: 36044639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics.
    Fiske ST; Dupree C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13593-7. PubMed ID: 25225372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balance as Credibility? How Presenting One- vs. Two-Sided Messages Affects Ratings of Scientists' and Politicians' Trustworthiness.
    Hendriks F; Janssen I; Jucks R
    Health Commun; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2757-2764. PubMed ID: 35980101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of self-disclosure and gender on a climate scientist's credibility and likability on social media.
    Kim N; Skurka C; Madden S
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Feb; ():9636625231225073. PubMed ID: 38326976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Secularism in science: The role of religious affiliation in assessments of scientists' trustworthiness.
    Beauchamp AL; Rios K
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Feb; 29(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 31778102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility.
    Vraga E; Myers T; Kotcher J; Beall L; Maibach E
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Feb; 5(2):170505. PubMed ID: 29515820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility.
    Agley J; Xiao Y; Thompson EE; Golzarri-Arroyo L
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Mar; 25():e45482. PubMed ID: 36995753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Science communication gets personal: Ambivalent effects of self-disclosure in science communication on trust in science.
    Altenmüller MS; Kampschulte L; Verbeek L; Gollwitzer M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Dec; 29(4):793-812. PubMed ID: 37589716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of gender in peer-group perceptions of climate scientists' media statements.
    Armstrong L; Adamson G
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Oct; 30(7):841-853. PubMed ID: 34213361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing YouTube science news' credibility: The impact of web-search on the role of video, source, and user attributes.
    Michalovich A; Hershkovitz A
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 May; 29(4):376-391. PubMed ID: 32072863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate.
    Yamamoto YT
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Jan; 21(1):101-25. PubMed ID: 22530490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Communicating trust and trustworthiness through scientists' biographies: Benevolence beliefs.
    Hautea S; Besley JC; Choung H
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Feb; ():9636625241228733. PubMed ID: 38369706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hot topics in science communication: Aggressive language decreases trustworthiness and credibility in scientific debates.
    König L; Jucks R
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 May; 28(4):401-416. PubMed ID: 30843467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frames of scientific evidence: How journalists represent the (un)certainty of molecular medicine in science television programs.
    Ruhrmann G; Guenther L; Kessler SH; Milde J
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Aug; 24(6):681-96. PubMed ID: 24280532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists.
    Barel-Ben David Y; Garty ES; Baram-Tsabari A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0222250. PubMed ID: 31914124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of weight-of-evidence strategies on audience perceptions of (un)certainty when media cover contested science.
    Kohl PA; Kim SY; Peng Y; Akin H; Koh EJ; Howell A; Dunwoody S
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Nov; 25(8):976-991. PubMed ID: 26657318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.