BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36197278)

  • 1. Comparative volumetric analysis of three different obturating materials in primary molars under cone beam computed tomography: an in-vitro study.
    Pandey A; K P; Avinash A; Pathivada L; Kumar B; Kapur D
    Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2023 Feb; 72(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 36197278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparative Analysis of Voids and Sealing Ability of Different Obturating Techniques Using CBCT.
    Singh A; Anand S; Prakash R; Ahmed A; Dhawan J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Oct; 23(10):1021-1025. PubMed ID: 37073916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars--a comparative clinical study.
    Subramaniam P; Gilhotra K
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 35(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 22046693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Asokan S; Sooriaprakas C; Raghu V; Bairavi R
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2012; 79(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 22828756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparative Volumetric Evaluation of Four Obturating Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Singh A; Gupta N; Agarwal N; Kumar D; Anand A
    Pediatr Dent; 2017 Mar; 39(2):11-16. PubMed ID: 28390451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Volumetric evaluation of various obturation techniques in primary teeth using cone beam computed tomography - An
    Nagaveni NB; Yadav S; Poornima P; Bharath KP; Mathew MG; Naveen Kumar PG
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(3):244-248. PubMed ID: 28762351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Pain in Primary Teeth Obturated With Zinc Oxide Eugenol versus Metapex: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Paranna S; Biradar J; Semwal M; Patil K; Suradkar S; Shinde S
    Mymensingh Med J; 2022 Oct; 31(4):1148-1152. PubMed ID: 36189565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Zinc oxide eugenol and Endoflas pulpectomy in primary molars: 24-month clinical and radiographic evaluation.
    Pandranki J; V Vanga NR; Chandrabhatla SK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2018; 36(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 29970635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Volumetric Evaluation of Different Obturation Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Spiral Computed Tomography.
    Nagaveni NB; Yadav S; Poornima P; Reddy VS; Roshan NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 28052215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of endoflas and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary dentition.
    Rewal N; Thakur AS; Sachdev V; Mahajan N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 25231040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and radiological evaluation of zinc oxide-eugenol and Maisto's paste as obturating materials in infected primary teeth--nine months study.
    Reddy VV; Fernandes
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1996 Jun; 14(2):39-44. PubMed ID: 9522755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Evaluation of Three Obturating Techniques in Primary Molars: An
    Ellana Jermiah J; Rao A; Srikant N; Rao A; Suprabha BS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(6):372-375. PubMed ID: 31657988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study.
    Grover R; Mehra M; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 23758458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of zinc oxide eugenol and metapex in root canal treatment of primary teeth.
    Gupta S; Das G
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 21985878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Various Herbal Products Used with Zinc Oxide as an Obturating Material in Primary Teeth: An
    Sunil ; Anand S; Ahmad A; Prakash R; Singh A; Megha V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Sep; 24(9):692-699. PubMed ID: 38152944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of the fracture resistance of teeth prepared with rotary system, filled with single cone gutta-percha and laterally condensed with zinc oxide eugenol and resin based (AH26) sealers to that of Resilon.
    Vishwanathan PK; Muliyar S; Chavan P; Reddy PM; Reddy TP; Nilawar S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):773-81. PubMed ID: 23404002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Different Root Canal Obturation Methods in Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography.
    Singh R; Chaudhary S; Manuja N; Chaitra TR; Sinha AA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 26551371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tamponade effect of resorbable biological barrier in quality of obturation in primary molar.
    Kakade A; Shetty H; Santosh A; Mali S; Badnaware S; Deshmukh B; Banthiya K
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Nov; 10(4):e12468. PubMed ID: 31544328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars.
    Walia T; Ghanbari AH; Mathew S; Ziadlou AH
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Feb; 18(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27885586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative assessment of different techniques for obturation with endoflas in primary molars: An
    Pandranki J; Chitturi RR; Vanga NR; Chandrabhatla SK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(1):44-48. PubMed ID: 28393816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.