143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36197316)
21. [Gunsight closure versus purse-string closure techniques in loop stoma reversal: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial].
Han JG; Zhou JP; Wang GY; Zhang H; Yang YC; Lu Y; Wu B; Wu AW; Yao HW; Wang ZJ;
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 58(8):608-613. PubMed ID: 32727192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A beneficial effect of purse-string skin closure after ileostomy takedown: a retrospective cohort study.
Suh YJ; Park JW; Kim YS; Park SC; Oh JH
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(6):615-20. PubMed ID: 24810869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Outcome of Purse-string Versus Conventional Wound Closure Techniques in Patients Undergoing Stoma Reversal: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ameer A; Mirza MB; Talat N
J Pediatr Surg; 2024 Jun; 59(6):1186-1189. PubMed ID: 37978002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds.
Reid K; Pockney P; Pollitt T; Draganic B; Smith SR
Br J Surg; 2010 Oct; 97(10):1511-7. PubMed ID: 20575111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Gunsight Procedure Versus the Purse-String Procedure for Closing Wounds After Stoma Reversal: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial.
Han JG; Yao HW; Zhou JP; Zhang H; Wang GY; Shen ZL; Gong JF; Wang ZJ;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Oct; 63(10):1411-1418. PubMed ID: 32969884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A combination of subcuticular sutures and subcutaneous closed-suction drainage reduces the risk of incisional surgical site infection in loop ileostomy closure.
Fukuoka K; Koyama F; Kuge H; Obara S; Nakamoto T; Iwasa Y; Takei T; Matsumoto Y; Sadamitsu T; Sho M
Surg Today; 2021 Apr; 51(4):605-611. PubMed ID: 32888080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure techniques in stoma closure: a comprehensive meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised trials.
Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Kennedy-Dalby A; Rehman S; Zadeh RA
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1319-1332. PubMed ID: 30074070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prevalence of surgical site infection at the stoma site following four skin closure techniques: a retrospective cohort study.
Li LT; Brahmbhatt R; Hicks SC; Davila JA; Berger DH; Liang MK
Dig Surg; 2014; 31(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 24776653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical Site Infection After Stoma Reversal: A Comparison Between Linear and Purse-String Closure.
Khan MA; Niaz K; Asghar S; Yusufi MA; Nazir M; Muhammad Ali S; Ahmed A; Salahudeen AA; Kareem T
Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50057. PubMed ID: 38186536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: A retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal.
Wada Y; Miyoshi N; Ohue M; Noura S; Fujino S; Sugimura K; Akita H; Motoori M; Gotoh K; Takahashi H; Kobayashi S; Ohmori T; Fujiwara Y; Yano M
Mol Clin Oncol; 2015 May; 3(3):619-622. PubMed ID: 26137277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Wound infection following stoma takedown: primary skin closure versus subcuticular purse-string suture.
Marquez TT; Christoforidis D; Abraham A; Madoff RD; Rothenberger DA
World J Surg; 2010 Dec; 34(12):2877-82. PubMed ID: 20703459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does Wound Irrigation with Clorhexidine Gluconate Reduce the Surgical Site Infection Rate in Closure of Temporary Loop Ileostomy? A Prospective Clinical Study.
Goztok M; Terzi MC; Egeli T; Arslan NC; Canda AE
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2018; 19(6):634-639. PubMed ID: 30040537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between Wound Closure Methods in the Reversal of Diverting Ileostomy.
Oh YH; Jeong JY; Kim KT; Kim JY
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2022 Mar; 79(3):109-117. PubMed ID: 35342168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Purse-string closure technique reduces the incidence of incisional hernias following the reversal of temporary ileostomy.
Juratli MA; Nour-Eldin NA; Ackermann H; Habbe N; Hannes S; Bechstein WO; Woeste G
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Jul; 33(7):973-977. PubMed ID: 29523989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Purse-string closure versus conventional primary closure of wound following stoma reversal: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Rondelli F; Franco L; Balzarotti Canger RC; Ceccarelli G; Becattini C; Bugiantella W
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():208-213. PubMed ID: 29474885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective comparison of three techniques.
Lord I; Reeves L; Gray A; Woodfield J; Clifford K; Thompson-Fawcett M
ANZ J Surg; 2020 Sep; 90(9):1632-1636. PubMed ID: 32419283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Wound Infection After Ileostomy Closure: An Interim Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Primary Versus Circumferential Subcuticular Closure Techniques.
Kaistha S; Panwar R; Pal S; Dash NR; Sahni P; Chattopadhyay TK
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2023 Nov; 24(9):797-802. PubMed ID: 37856166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor.
Akiyoshi T; Fujimoto Y; Konishi T; Kuroyanagi H; Ueno M; Oya M; Yamaguchi T
World J Surg; 2010 Aug; 34(8):1937-42. PubMed ID: 20372898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy to improve wound healing rates following ileostomy closure: a randomized controlled trial.
Tiang T; Behrenbruch C; Noori J; Lam D; Bhamidipaty M; Johnston M; Woods R; D'Souza B
ANZ J Surg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38525845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Subcutaneous vacuum drains reduce surgical site infection after primary closure of defunctioning ileostomy.
Pan HD; Wang L; Peng YF; Li M; Yao YF; Zhao J; Zhan TC; Du CZ; Gu J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jul; 30(7):977-82. PubMed ID: 25700809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
