128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36197888)
1. Determinants of mammography screening participation-a cross-sectional analysis of the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS).
Pokora RM; Büttner M; Schulz A; Schuster AK; Merzenich H; Teifke A; Michal M; Lackner K; Münzel T; Zeissig SR; Wild PS; Singer S; Wollschläger D
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275525. PubMed ID: 36197888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer incidence and mammography screening among resettlers in Germany.
Kaucher S; Khil L; Kajüter H; Becher H; Reder M; Kolip P; Spallek J; Winkler V; Berens EM
BMC Public Health; 2020 Mar; 20(1):417. PubMed ID: 32228537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decomposing socioeconomic disparity in the utilization of screening mammography: A cross-sectional analysis from the RaNCD cohort study.
Soofi M; Karami-Matin B; Najafi F; Naghshbandi P; Soltani S
Health Care Women Int; 2023 Sep; 44(9):1092-1105. PubMed ID: 34982660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small-area spatio-temporal analyses of participation rates in the mammography screening program in the city of Dortmund (NW Germany).
Lemke D; Berkemeyer S; Mattauch V; Heidinger O; Pebesma E; Hense HW
BMC Public Health; 2015 Nov; 15():1190. PubMed ID: 26615393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Introduction of an organised programme and social inequalities in mammography screening: A 22-year population-based study in Geneva, Switzerland.
Sandoval JL; Theler JM; Cullati S; Bouchardy C; Manor O; Gaspoz JM; Guessous I
Prev Med; 2017 Oct; 103():49-55. PubMed ID: 28778819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors associated with mammography screening among Reunionese women : a cross-sectional study.
Deneche I; Touzani R; Bouhnik AD; Rey D; Bendiane MK; Chirpaz E
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2022 Jun; 70(3):117-122. PubMed ID: 35491336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of the impact of the mammography screening program on breast cancer mortality: feasibility study on linking several data sources in North Rhine-Westphalia].
Fuhs A; Bartholomäus S; Heidinger O; Hense HW
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Jan; 57(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 24357174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol.
Berens EM; Reder M; Kolip P; Spallek J
BMJ Open; 2014 Sep; 4(9):e006145. PubMed ID: 25231495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Socio-demographic correlates of participation in mammography: a survey among women aged between 35- 69 in Tehran, Iran.
Samah AA; Ahmadian M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(6):2717-20. PubMed ID: 22938447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. German mammography screening program: program sensitivity between 2010 and 2016 estimated based on German health claims data.
Heinze F; Czwikla J; Heinig M; Langner I; Haug U
BMC Cancer; 2023 Sep; 23(1):852. PubMed ID: 37697304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Educational level, voluntary private health insurance and opportunistic cancer screening among women in Catalonia (Spain).
Borràs JM; Guillen M; Sánchez V; Juncà S; Vicente R
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1999 Oct; 8(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 10548398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Role of Social Determinants of Health in Self-Reported Access to Health Care Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography.
Henderson LM; O'Meara ES; Haas JS; Lee CI; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Alford-Teaster J; Onega T
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 Nov; 29(11):1437-1446. PubMed ID: 32366199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999-2011.
Morrell S; Taylor R; Roder D; Robson B; Gregory M; Craig K
Br J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 116(6):828-839. PubMed ID: 28183141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporal trend in socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of cancer screening programmes in France between 2005 and 2010: results from the Cancer Barometer surveys.
Kelly DM; Estaquio C; Léon C; Arwidson P; Nabi H
BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e016941. PubMed ID: 29247085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Population-based mammography screening attendance in Sweden 2017-2018: A cross-sectional register study to assess the impact of sociodemographic factors.
Lagerlund M; Åkesson A; Zackrisson S
Breast; 2021 Oct; 59():16-26. PubMed ID: 34118780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inequalities in uptake of breast cancer screening in Spain: analysis of a cross-sectional national survey.
Martín-López R; Jiménez-García R; Lopez-de-Andres A; Hernández-Barrera V; Jiménez-Trujillo I; Gil-de-Miguel A; Carrasco-Garrido P
Public Health; 2013 Sep; 127(9):822-7. PubMed ID: 23773337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Explains Education Disparities in Screening Mammography in the United States? A Comparison with The Netherlands.
Koç H; O'Donnell O; Van Ourti T
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30205539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Social Determinants of Breast Cancer Screening among Married Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Ghanbari A; Rahmatpour P; Hosseini N; Khalili M
J Res Health Sci; 2020 Feb; 20(1):e00467. PubMed ID: 32814688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Could mobile mammography reduce social and geographic inequalities in breast cancer screening participation?
Guillaume E; Launay L; Dejardin O; Bouvier V; Guittet L; Déan P; Notari A; De Mil R; Launoy G
Prev Med; 2017 Jul; 100():84-88. PubMed ID: 28408217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Uptake of Breast Cancer Screening among Saudi Women: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Survey.
Al-Hanawi MK; Hashmi R; Almubark S; Qattan AMN; Pulok MH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32244881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
