121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36198569)
21. Patient exposure to X-rays during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention: results of a multicenter national survey.
Georges JL; Belle L; Ricard C; Cattan S; Albert F; Hirsch JL; Monsegu J; Dibie A; Khalife K; Caussin C; Maccia C; Livarek B; Hanssen M;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Apr; 83(5):729-38. PubMed ID: 24323486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Local patient dose diagnostic reference levels in pediatric interventional cardiology in Chile using age bands and patient weight values.
Ubeda C; Miranda P; Vano E
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):615-622. PubMed ID: 28102608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Determinants of Greater Peak Radiation Skin Dose in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
Hasegawa H; Sakakura K; Hamamoto K; Yamamoto K; Taniguchi Y; Tsukui T; Seguchi M; Wada H; Momomura SI; Fujita H
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Jan; 21(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 30948291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiation exposure and establishment of diagnostic reference levels of whole-body low-dose CT for the assessment of multiple myeloma with second- and third-generation dual-source CT.
Zensen S; Bos D; Opitz M; Haubold J; Forsting M; Guberina N; Wetter A
Acta Radiol; 2022 Apr; 63(4):527-535. PubMed ID: 33745295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A MULTICENTRE SURVEY OF LOCAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS AND ACHIEVABLE DOSE FOR CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY INTERVENTION PROCEDURES IN KOREA.
Kim JS; Lee BK; Ryu DR; Chun KJ; Choi HH; Roh Y; Kwon SM; Cho BR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 31605144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic reference levels for fluoroscopically guided procedures in a South African tertiary hospital.
Malan L; Pitcher RD; da Silva M; Breuninger S; Groenewald W
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jun; 62(6):807-814. PubMed ID: 32640888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Present Situation of Fluoroscopy Radiation Doses in Many IVR Systems].
Inaba Y; Kobayashi R; Chida K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Aug; 72(8):689-94. PubMed ID: 27546083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modulated radiation protocol achieves marked reduction of radiation exposure for chronic total coronary occlusion intervention.
Werner GS; Yaginuma K; Koch M; Tischer K; Silber M; Werner J; Keuser T; Moehlis H
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 May; 97(6):1196-1206. PubMed ID: 32667134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Full feature selection for estimating KAP radiation dose in coronary angiographies and percutaneous coronary interventions.
Suomi V; Järvinen J; Kiviniemi T; Ylitalo A; Pietilä M
Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103725. PubMed ID: 32250855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reduction of radiation exposure during complex interventions for chronic total coronary occlusions: Implementing low dose radiation protocols without affecting procedural success rates.
Werner GS; Glaser P; Coenen A; Moehlis H; Tischer KH; Koch M; Klingenbeck R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 28112448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patient exposure data and operator dose in coronary interventional procedures: Impact of body-mass index and procedure complexity.
Zanca F; Collard C; Alexandre N; Deprez F; Salembier JP; Henry M; Rombaut E; Massart PE
Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():38-43. PubMed ID: 32593137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vivo validation of Dosemap software use in interventional cardiology with dosimetrics indicators and peak skin dose evaluation.
Didier R; Bourhis D; Oueslati C; Nasr B; Le Ven F; Noël A; Jobic Y; Damien P; Pene-Baverez D; Mansourati J; Nicol PP; Gilard M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Aug; 94(2):216-222. PubMed ID: 30719828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of novel X-ray imaging technology on radiation exposure during chronic total occlusion procedures.
Busse T; Reifart J; Reifart N
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 30196546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort.
Patel TM; Shah SC; Soni YY; Radadiya RC; Patel GA; Tiwari PO; Pancholy SB
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(5):e008888. PubMed ID: 32406263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Anthropometric parameters and radiation doses during percutaneous coronary procedures.
Manicardi M; Nocetti L; Brigidi A; Cadioli C; Sgreccia D; Valenti AC; Vitolo M; Arrotti S; Monopoli DE; Sgura F; Rossi R; Guidi G; Boriani G
Phys Med; 2022 Aug; 100():164-175. PubMed ID: 35901630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiation dose and diagnostic reference levels for four interventional radiology procedures: results of the prospective European multicenter survey EUCLID.
Schegerer AA; Frija G; Paulo G; Jaschke W; Tsapaki V; Repussard J; Damilakis J
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9346-9360. PubMed ID: 33991223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Multicenter Follow-up Survey on Radiation Dose Levels in Cardiovascular X-ray Apparatus under Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Conditions].
Sekiguchi H; Tsukamoto A; Ishida H; Ueno H; Kittaka D; Tanabe N; Fujimura K; Imazeki M; Ishikawa E; Kageyama T; Sato H; Tajima O
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(9):944-954. PubMed ID: 32963140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Establishing Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in IR Procedures with Dose Management Software.
Heilmaier C; Zuber N; Berthold C; Kara L; Weishaupt D
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):429-441. PubMed ID: 28034700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
