These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36198890)

  • 1. AHP-based multi-criteria decision-making for forest sustainability of lower Himalayan foothills in northern circle, India-a case study.
    Anuradha ; Gupta S
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Oct; 194(12):849. PubMed ID: 36198890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A sustainable forest management criteria and indicators assessment using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.
    Bayram BÇ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Jun; 193(7):425. PubMed ID: 34132901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A priory allocation of ecosystem services to forest stands in a forest management context considering scientific suitability, stakeholder engagement and sustainability concept with multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) technique: A case study in Turkey.
    Başkent EZ; Balci H
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Oct; 369():122230. PubMed ID: 39197346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sustainability assessment in forest management based on individual preferences.
    Martín-Fernández S; Martinez-Falero E
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():482-489. PubMed ID: 29107804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An integrated approach of Ecological Footprint (EF) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in human ecology: A base for planning toward sustainability.
    Fatemi M; Rezaei-Moghaddam K; Karami E; Hayati D; Wackernagel M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250167. PubMed ID: 33861764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is enhanced biodiversity protection conflicting with ambitious bioenergy targets in eastern Finland?
    den Herder M; Kurttila M; Leskinen P; Lindner M; Haatanen A; Sironen S; Salminen O; Juusti V; Holma A
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Feb; 187():54-62. PubMed ID: 27883939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applying the ecosystem approach to select priority areas for forest landscape restoration in the Yungas, Northwestern Argentina.
    Ianni E; Geneletti D
    Environ Manage; 2010 Nov; 46(5):748-60. PubMed ID: 20814677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ranking of industrial forest plantations in terms of sustainability: A multicriteria approach.
    Diaz-Balteiro L; Alfranca O; González-Pachón J; Romero C
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 180():123-32. PubMed ID: 27213865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative assessment of people-oriented forestry in Bangladesh: a case study in the Tangail forest division.
    Muhammed N; Koike M; Haque F; Miah MD
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jul; 88(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 17379393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis and deliberation as a mechanism to assess changes in preferences for indicators of sustainable forest management: a case study in Puebla, Mexico.
    Rodriguez-Piñeros S; Lewis DK
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():52-61. PubMed ID: 23722174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of national forest-management regimes on unprotected forests of the Himalaya.
    Brandt JS; Allendorf T; Radeloff V; Brooks J
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1271-1282. PubMed ID: 28295561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating alternative forest management strategies for the Champagne and Aishihik Traditional Territory, southwest Yukon.
    Waeber PO; Nitschke CR; Le Ferrec A; Harshaw HW; Innes JL
    J Environ Manage; 2013 May; 120():148-56. PubMed ID: 23535452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the sustainability of forest management: an application of multi-criteria decision analysis to community forests in northern Ethiopia.
    Balana BB; Mathijs E; Muys B
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Jun; 91(6):1294-304. PubMed ID: 20206436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementing participatory decision making in forest planning.
    Ananda J
    Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 39(4):534-44. PubMed ID: 17318695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Criteria and indicators for the assessment of community forestry outcomes: a comparative analysis from Canada.
    Teitelbaum S
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():257-67. PubMed ID: 24321286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A criteria and indicators monitoring framework for food forestry embedded in the principles of ecological restoration.
    Park H; Higgs E
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Feb; 190(3):113. PubMed ID: 29396659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Difficult climate-adaptive decisions in forests as complex social-ecological systems.
    Findlater K; Kozak R; Hagerman S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jan; 119(4):. PubMed ID: 35042791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The sustainable management and protection of forests: analysis of the current position globally.
    Freer-Smith P; Carnus JM
    Ambio; 2008 Jun; 37(4):254-62. PubMed ID: 18686504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Institutionalising co-management activities for conservation of forest resources: Evidence from the Sundarban mangrove forest management of Bangladesh.
    Begum F; Lobry de Bruyn L; Kristiansen P; Islam MA
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 298():113504. PubMed ID: 34426227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.