242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36199168)
1. Recurrence rate after radical prostatectomy following primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer with
Klingenberg S; Fredsøe J; Sørensen KD; Ulhøi BP; Borre M; Jochumsen MR; Bouchelouche K
Acta Oncol; 2022 Oct; 61(10):1289-1294. PubMed ID: 36199168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distribution of prostate cancer recurrences on gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (
Huits TH; Luiting HB; van der Poel HG; Nandurkar R; Donswijk M; Schaake E; Vogel W; Roobol MJ; Wit E; Stricker P; Emmett L; van Leeuwen PJ
BJU Int; 2020 Jun; 125(6):876-883. PubMed ID: 32181951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic accuracy of
Rajwa P; Heidenreich J; Drzezga A; Schmidt M; Shariat SF; Heidenreich A
Prostate; 2024 Jan; 84(1):74-78. PubMed ID: 37750292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for detecting lymph node metastases in primary and recurrent prostate cancer and location of recurrence after radical prostatectomy: an overview of the current literature.
Luiting HB; van Leeuwen PJ; Busstra MB; Brabander T; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Vis AN; Emmett L; Stricker PD; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 31680398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit.
Maestroni UV; Campobasso D; Guarino G; Acampora A; Scarlattei M; Ziglioli F; Dinale F; Baldari G; Migliari S; Gasparro D; Ferretti S; Silini EM; Ruffini L
Chin Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 12(3):22. PubMed ID: 37417288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and
Sawicki LM; Kirchner J; Buddensieck C; Antke C; Ullrich T; Schimmöller L; Boos J; Schleich C; Schaarschmidt BM; Buchbender C; Heusch P; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Müller HW; Hautzel H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1542-1550. PubMed ID: 30879122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
Farolfi A; Ceci F; Castellucci P; Graziani T; Siepe G; Lambertini A; Schiavina R; Lodi F; Morganti AG; Fanti S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jan; 46(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 29905907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Presurgical
Djaïleb L; Armstrong WR; Thompson D; Gafita A; Farolfi A; Rajagopal A; Grogan TR; Nguyen K; Benz MR; Hotta M; Barbato F; Ceci F; Schwarzenböck SM; Unterrainer M; Zacho HD; Juarez R; Cooperberg M; Carroll P; Washington S; Reiter RE; Eiber M; Herrmann K; Fendler WP; Czernin J; Hope TA; Calais J
Eur Urol; 2023 Dec; 84(6):588-596. PubMed ID: 37482512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT defines a subgroup of high-risk prostate cancer patients with favorable outcomes after radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection.
Dekalo S; Kuten J; Mintz I; Fahoum I; Gitstein G; Keizman D; Sarid D; Matzkin H; Mabjeesh NJ; Beri A; Even-Sapir E; Yossepowitch O; Mano R
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Sep; 24(3):910-916. PubMed ID: 33790418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary lymph-node staging with
Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
Esen T; Falay O; Tarim K; Armutlu A; Koseoglu E; Kilic M; Seymen H; Sarikaya AF; Kiremit MC; Balbay MD; Canda AE; Baydar DE; Kordan Y; Demirkol MO; Tilki D
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 33509671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study.
Donswijk ML; van Leeuwen PJ; Vegt E; Cheung Z; Heijmink SWTPJ; van der Poel HG; Stokkel MPM
BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):723. PubMed ID: 32758168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Klingenberg S; Jochumsen MR; Ulhøi BP; Fredsøe J; Sørensen KD; Borre M; Bouchelouche K
J Nucl Med; 2021 Feb; 62(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 32444374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy, Predictive Factors, and Prediction Nomograms for
Rauscher I; Düwel C; Haller B; Rischpler C; Heck MM; Gschwend JE; Schwaiger M; Maurer T; Eiber M
Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):656-661. PubMed ID: 29358059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (
van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk M; Nandurkar R; Stricker P; Ho B; Heijmink S; Wit EMK; Tillier C; van Muilenkom E; Nguyen Q; van der Poel HG; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Jul; 124(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 30074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incremental Impact of [
Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
Lenis AT; Pooli A; Lec PM; Sadun TY; Johnson DC; Lebacle C; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
