BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36201546)

  • 1. Comparing virtual reality, desktop-based 3D, and 2D versions of a category learning experiment.
    Barrett RCA; Poe R; O'Camb JW; Woodruff C; Harrison SM; Dolguikh K; Chuong C; Klassen AD; Zhang R; Joseph RB; Blair MR
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275119. PubMed ID: 36201546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3D virtual reality vs. 2D desktop registration user interface comparison.
    Bueckle A; Buehling K; Shih PC; Börner K
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258103. PubMed ID: 34705835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing a virtual reality head-mounted display to on-screen three-dimensional visualization and two-dimensional computed tomography data for training in decision making in hepatic surgery: a randomized controlled study.
    Preukschas AA; Wise PA; Bettscheider L; Pfeiffer M; Wagner M; Huber M; Golriz M; Fischer L; Mehrabi A; Rössler F; Speidel S; Hackert T; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F; Kenngott HG
    Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2483-2496. PubMed ID: 38456945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the effects of 3D-360°VR and 2D viewing modes on gaze behavior, head excursion, and workload during a boxing specific anticipation task.
    Loiseau Taupin M; Romeas T; Juste L; Labbé DR
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1235984. PubMed ID: 37680243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creating 3D models from Radiologic Images for Virtual Reality Medical Education Modules.
    Ammanuel S; Brown I; Uribe J; Rehani B
    J Med Syst; 2019 May; 43(6):166. PubMed ID: 31053902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye movement characteristics in a mental rotation task presented in virtual reality.
    Tang Z; Liu X; Huo H; Tang M; Qiao X; Chen D; Dong Y; Fan L; Wang J; Du X; Guo J; Tian S; Fan Y
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1143006. PubMed ID: 37051147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized study comparing 3D virtual reality and conventional 2D on-screen teaching of cerebrovascular anatomy.
    Greuter L; De Rosa A; Cattin P; Croci DM; Soleman J; Guzman R
    Neurosurg Focus; 2021 Aug; 51(2):E18. PubMed ID: 34333473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EHTask: Recognizing User Tasks From Eye and Head Movements in Immersive Virtual Reality.
    Hu Z; Bulling A; Li S; Wang G
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Apr; 29(4):1992-2004. PubMed ID: 34962869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using virtual reality for anatomical landmark annotation in geometric morphometrics.
    Messer D; Atchapero M; Jensen MB; Svendsen MS; Galatius A; Olsen MT; Frisvad JR; Dahl VA; Conradsen K; Dahl AB; Bærentzen A
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e12869. PubMed ID: 35186472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Desktop VR Is Better Than Non-ambulatory HMD VR for Spatial Learning.
    Srivastava P; Rimzhim A; Vijay P; Singh S; Chandra S
    Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():50. PubMed ID: 33501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of positive, negative and neutral stimuli in a virtual reality cognitive-motor rehabilitation task: a pilot study with stroke patients.
    Cameirão MS; Faria AL; Paulino T; Alves J; Bermúdez I Badia S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 13(1):70. PubMed ID: 27503215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stereoscopic virtual reality does not improve knowledge acquisition of congenital heart disease.
    Patel N; Costa A; Sanders SP; Ezon D
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jul; 37(7):2283-2290. PubMed ID: 33677745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reaching in Several Realities: Motor and Cognitive Benefits of Different Visualization Technologies.
    Wenk N; Penalver-Andres J; Palma R; Buetler KA; Muri R; Nef T; Marchal-Crespo L
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():1037-1042. PubMed ID: 31374766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumers' food selection behaviors in three-dimensional (3D) virtual reality.
    Siegrist M; Ung CY; Zank M; Marinello M; Kunz A; Hartmann C; Menozzi M
    Food Res Int; 2019 Mar; 117():50-59. PubMed ID: 30736923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A quantitative method for evaluation of 6 degree of freedom virtual reality systems.
    Jost TA; Drewelow G; Koziol S; Rylander J
    J Biomech; 2019 Dec; 97():109379. PubMed ID: 31679757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining the effect of virtual reality therapy on cognition post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wiley E; Khattab S; Tang A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Jan; 17(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 32363955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gaze-based attention network analysis in a virtual reality classroom.
    Stark P; Hasenbein L; Kasneci E; Göllner R
    MethodsX; 2024 Jun; 12():102662. PubMed ID: 38577409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced Attention Using Head-mounted Virtual Reality.
    Li G; Anguera JA; Javed SV; Khan MA; Wang G; Gazzaley A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 32(8):1438-1454. PubMed ID: 32286132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing eye-hand coordination between controller-mediated virtual reality, and a real-world object interaction task.
    Lavoie E; Hebert JS; Chapman CS
    J Vis; 2024 Feb; 24(2):9. PubMed ID: 38393742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The same video game in 2D, 3D or virtual reality - How does technology impact game evaluation and brand placements?
    Roettl J; Terlutter R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200724. PubMed ID: 30028839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.