306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36201785)
1. Predictive Models for Estimating the Probability of Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review.
Black N; Henderson I; Al Wattar BH; Quenby S
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 140(5):821-841. PubMed ID: 36201785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction models of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A systematic review.
Deng B; Li Y; Chen JY; Guo J; Tan J; Yang Y; Liu N
Int J Nurs Stud; 2022 Nov; 135():104359. PubMed ID: 36152466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic models for predicting clinical disease progression, worsening and activity in people with multiple sclerosis.
Reeve K; On BI; Havla J; Burns J; Gosteli-Peter MA; Alabsawi A; Alayash Z; Götschi A; Seibold H; Mansmann U; Held U
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 9(9):CD013606. PubMed ID: 37681561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation.
Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; Abdulrahim B; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 31960915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mekonnen BD; Asfaw AA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Jan; 23(1):65. PubMed ID: 36703101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal Delivery After External Cephalic Version in Patients With a Previous Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Homafar M; Gerard J; Turrentine M
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 136(5):965-971. PubMed ID: 33030882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.
Wingert A; Hartling L; Sebastianski M; Johnson C; Featherstone R; Vandermeer B; Wilson RD
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Dec; 19(1):529. PubMed ID: 31888540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Third-trimester prediction of successful vaginal birth after one cesarean delivery-A Swedish model.
Carlsson Fagerberg M; Källén K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 May; 99(5):660-668. PubMed ID: 31788783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?
Harris BS; Heine RP; Park J; Faurot KR; Hopkins MK; Rivara AJ; Kemeny HR; Grotegut CA; Jelovsek JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):492.e1-492.e7. PubMed ID: 30716285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period.
Mardy AH; Ananth CV; Grobman WA; Gyamfi-Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):513.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27262971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Haumonte JB; Raylet M; Christophe M; Mauviel F; Bertrand A; Desbriere R; d'Ercole C
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 47(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29229362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Costantine MM; Fox K; Byers BD; Mateus J; Ghulmiyyah LM; Blackwell S; Hankins GDV; Grobman WA; Saade G
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 20168103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal.
Wynants L; Van Calster B; Collins GS; Riley RD; Heinze G; Schuit E; Bonten MMJ; Dahly DL; Damen JAA; Debray TPA; de Jong VMT; De Vos M; Dhiman P; Haller MC; Harhay MO; Henckaerts L; Heus P; Kammer M; Kreuzberger N; Lohmann A; Luijken K; Ma J; Martin GP; McLernon DJ; Andaur Navarro CL; Reitsma JB; Sergeant JC; Shi C; Skoetz N; Smits LJM; Snell KIE; Sperrin M; Spijker R; Steyerberg EW; Takada T; Tzoulaki I; van Kuijk SMJ; van Bussel B; van der Horst ICC; van Royen FS; Verbakel JY; Wallisch C; Wilkinson J; Wolff R; Hooft L; Moons KGM; van Smeden M
BMJ; 2020 Apr; 369():m1328. PubMed ID: 32265220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic models for predicting relapse or recurrence of major depressive disorder in adults.
Moriarty AS; Meader N; Snell KI; Riley RD; Paton LW; Chew-Graham CA; Gilbody S; Churchill R; Phillips RS; Ali S; McMillan D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD013491. PubMed ID: 33956992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kreuzberger N; Damen JA; Trivella M; Estcourt LJ; Aldin A; Umlauff L; Vazquez-Montes MD; Wolff R; Moons KG; Monsef I; Foroutan F; Kreuzer KA; Skoetz N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD012022. PubMed ID: 32735048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted?
Eden KB; McDonagh M; Denman MA; Marshall N; Emeis C; Fu R; Janik R; Walker M; Guise JM
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 116(4):967-981. PubMed ID: 20859163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of ante-partum ultrasound in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: A prospective cohort study.
Rizzo G; Bitsadze V; Khizroeva J; Mappa I; Makatsariya A; Liberati M; D'Antonio F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():385-390. PubMed ID: 33279807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multivariable prediction models for fetal macrosomia and large for gestational age: A systematic review.
Ewington L; Black N; Leeson C; Al Wattar BH; Quenby S
BJOG; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38465451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Establishment and validation of a prediction model for vaginal delivery after cesarean and its pregnancy outcomes-Based on a prospective study.
Lin J; Hou Y; Ke Y; Zeng W; Gu W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Nov; 242():114-121. PubMed ID: 31580963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
