155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36201967)
1. Effect of automation failure type on trust development in driving automation systems.
Mishler S; Chen J
Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103913. PubMed ID: 36201967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prior Familiarization With Takeover Requests Affects Drivers' Takeover Performance and Automation Trust.
Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Krems JF
Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):457-470. PubMed ID: 27923886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why Do I Have to Drive Now? Post Hoc Explanations of Takeover Requests.
Körber M; Prasch L; Bengler K
Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):305-323. PubMed ID: 29283269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.
Jin M; Lu G; Chen F; Shi X; Tan H; Zhai J
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106156. PubMed ID: 33957474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.
Shahini F; Park J; Welch K; Zahabi M
Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):182-197. PubMed ID: 35451915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Designing for the Extremes: Modeling Drivers' Response Time to Take Back Control From Automation Using Bayesian Quantile Regression.
DinparastDjadid A; Lee JD; Domeyer J; Schwarz C; Brown TL; Gunaratne P
Hum Factors; 2021 May; 63(3):519-530. PubMed ID: 31874049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding trust calibration in automated driving: the effect of time, personality, and system warning design.
Qu J; Zhou R; Zhang Y; Ma Q
Ergonomics; 2023 Dec; 66(12):2165-2181. PubMed ID: 36920361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.
Tan X; Zhang Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Apr; 168():106593. PubMed ID: 35180465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How Can the Trust-Change Direction be Measured and Identified During Takeover Transitions in Conditionally Automated Driving? Using Physiological Responses and Takeover-Related Factors.
Yi B; Cao H; Song X; Wang J; Zhao S; Guo W; Cao D
Hum Factors; 2024 Apr; 66(4):1276-1301. PubMed ID: 36625335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance.
Ma S; Zhang W; Yang Z; Kang C; Wu C; Chai C; Shi J; Li H
Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(7):482-487. PubMed ID: 32822218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calibration of Trust in Automated Driving: A Matter of Initial Level of Trust and Automated Driving Style?
Manchon JB; Bueno M; Navarro J
Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1613-1629. PubMed ID: 34861787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is driving experience all that matters? Drivers' takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.
Zhang N; Fard M; Davy JL; Parida S; Robinson SR
J Safety Res; 2023 Dec; 87():323-331. PubMed ID: 38081705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.
Wandtner B; Schömig N; Schmidt G
Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):870-881. PubMed ID: 29617161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of driving style on takeover performance during automated driving: Under the influence of warning system factors.
Zhang Y; Ma Q; Qu J; Zhou R
Appl Ergon; 2024 May; 117():104229. PubMed ID: 38232632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Olfactory Facilitation of Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.
Tang Q; Guo G; Zhang Z; Zhang B; Wu Y
Hum Factors; 2021 Jun; 63(4):553-564. PubMed ID: 31999480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.
Du N; Zhou F; Pulver EM; Tilbury DM; Robert LP; Pradhan AK; Yang XJ
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105748. PubMed ID: 33099127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Behavioral Changes to Repeated Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving: Effects of the Takeover-Request Design and the Nondriving-Related Task Modality.
Roche F; Somieski A; Brandenburg S
Hum Factors; 2019 Aug; 61(5):839-849. PubMed ID: 30517032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of duration of monitoring before takeover request on takeover time with insights into eye tracking data.
Huang C; Yang B; Nakano K
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107018. PubMed ID: 36924623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation.
Becker S; Brandenburg S; Thüring M
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106725. PubMed ID: 35878555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech-based takeover requests in conditionally automated driving: Effects of different voices on the driver takeover performance.
Wang Y; Zhang W; Zhou R
Appl Ergon; 2022 May; 101():103695. PubMed ID: 35091271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
