243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36202231)
1. Is total laparoscopic hysterectomy with longer operative time associated with a decreased benefit compared with total abdominal hysterectomy?
Chakraborty N; Rhodes S; Luchristt D; Bretschneider CE; Sheyn D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 228(2):205.e1-205.e12. PubMed ID: 36202231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.
Louie M; Strassle PD; Moulder JK; Dizon AM; Schiff LD; Carey ET
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):480.e1-480.e8. PubMed ID: 29959931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of length of surgery on the incidence of venous thromboembolism after benign hysterectomy.
Moulder JK; Moore KJ; Strassle PD; Louie M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):364.e1-364.e7. PubMed ID: 33039394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of hysterectomy at the time of myomectomy: an underestimated surgical risk.
Coyne K; Purdy MP; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Khan Z
Fertil Steril; 2024 Jan; 121(1):107-116. PubMed ID: 37777107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends and Perioperative Outcomes across Elective Benign Hysterectomy Procedures from the ACS-NSQIP 2007-2017.
Tyan P; Hawa N; Carey E; Urbina P; Chen FR; Sparks A; Amdur R; Moawad G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):365-374.e2. PubMed ID: 34610464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy or Total Vaginal Hysterectomy for Large Uteri.
Sailofsky S; Darin C; Alfahmy A; Sheyn D
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 137(3):445-453. PubMed ID: 33543889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postoperative complications of epidural analgesia at hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancies: an analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Ackroyd SA; Hernandez E; Roberts ME; Chu C; Rubin S; Mantia-Smaldone G; Houck K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1203-1209. PubMed ID: 32457094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in operative time and outcomes in minimally invasive hysterectomy from 2008 to 2018.
Luchristt D; Brown O; Kenton K; Bretschneider CE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):202.e1-202.e12. PubMed ID: 32791126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trainee participation and perioperative complications in benign hysterectomy: the effect of route of surgery.
Barber EL; Harris B; Gehrig PA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):215.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26884272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
