191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36203279)
1. Comparison Between 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages: 1-Year Outcome After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
Kim DY; Kwon OH; Park JY
Neurospine; 2022 Sep; 19(3):524-532. PubMed ID: 36203279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of Polyetheretherketone and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Singhatanadgige W; Tangchitcharoen N; Kerr SJ; Tanasansomboon T; Yingsakmongkol W; Kotheeranurak V; Limthongkul W
World Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 168():e471-e479. PubMed ID: 36216250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Analysis of Radiologic Outcomes Between Polyetheretherketone and Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Sultana T; Hossain M; Jeong JH; Im S
World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e241-e255. PubMed ID: 37611804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.
Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X
Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Promotion of higher rates of early fusion using activated titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in adults undergoing 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a randomized controlled trial.
Toop N; Dhaliwal J; Gifford CS; Gibbs D; Keister A; Miracle S; Forghani R; Grossbach AJ; Farhadi HF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Nov; 39(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 37542447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduced Subsidence With PEEK-Titanium Composite Versus 3D Titanium Cages in a Retrospective, Self-Controlled Study in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Chahlavi A
Global Spine J; 2024 May; ():21925682241253168. PubMed ID: 38780086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.
Adl Amini D; Okano I; Oezel L; Zhu J; Chiapparelli E; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2377-2384. PubMed ID: 34215921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Graft subsidence and reoperation after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched and cost analysis of polyetheretherketone versus 3D-printed porous titanium interbodies.
Alan N; Deng H; Muthiah N; Vodovotz L; Dembinski R; Guha D; Agarwal N; Ozpinar A; Hamilton DK; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 37178027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of Ti/PEEK Versus PEEK Cages in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Yao YC; Chou PH; Lin HH; Wang ST; Chang MC
Global Spine J; 2023 Mar; 13(2):472-478. PubMed ID: 33733888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, and Clinical Results Between 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage and Polyetheretherketone Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.
Yang JJ; Kim DM; Park S
World Neurosurg; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37419312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Cutler AR; Siddiqui S; Mohan AL; Hillard VH; Cerabona F; Das K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 17176018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lumbar interbody fusion rates with 3D-printed lamellar titanium cages using a silicate-substituted calcium phosphate bone graft.
Mokawem M; Katzouraki G; Harman CL; Lee R
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 68():134-139. PubMed ID: 31351704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.
Nemoto O; Asazuma T; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Yasuoka H; Fujikawa A
Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2150-5. PubMed ID: 25015180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fusion assessment in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.
Adl Amini D; Moser M; Oezel L; Shue J; Pumberger M; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
J Spine Surg; 2022 Sep; 8(3):323-332. PubMed ID: 36285103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Duan Y; Feng D; Li T; Wang Y; Jiang L; Huang Y
World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():144-156. PubMed ID: 38145654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.
Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
Zhu C; He M; Mao L; Yang H; Hu B; Zhang L; Feng G; Liu L; Song Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(1):918. PubMed ID: 34724952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for polyetheretherketone cage subsidence following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singhatanadgige W; Sukthuayat A; Tanaviriyachai T; Kongtharvonskul J; Tanasansomboon T; Kerr SJ; Limthongkul W
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2021 Sep; 163(9):2557-2565. PubMed ID: 34297205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].
Wen J; Yang Y; Zhang H; Liu L; Liu YL; Liu Y; Wang D; Wang ZP
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Mar; 32(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30921999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
