180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36205599)
21. Decreased Recurrence of Urolithiasis After Simultaneous Ureteroscopic Surgery for Ureter and Ipsilateral Renal Calculi: Comparison to Shockwave Lithotripsy for Ureter Calculi Alone.
Ito K; Takahashi T; Kanno T; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H
Urology; 2021 Jan; 147():74-80. PubMed ID: 33181120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Surgical Trends in Nephrolithiasis: Increasing
Metzler IS; Holt S; Harper JD
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):769-774. PubMed ID: 33430693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Postoperative Emergency Department Visits After Urinary Stone Surgery: Variation Based on Surgical Modality.
Khanna A; Fedrigon D; Monga M; Gao T; Schold J; Abouassaly R
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):93-98. PubMed ID: 31691596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of previous SWL on ureterorenoscopy outcomes and optimal timing for ureterorenoscopy after SWL failure in proximal ureteral stones.
Irer B; Sahin MO; Erbatu O; Yildiz A; Ongun S; Cinar O; Cihan A; Sahin M; Sen V; Ucer O; Kizilay F; Bozkurt O;
World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):769-774. PubMed ID: 31098658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors Associated with Regional Adoption of Ureteroscopy in California from 2005 to 2016.
Wiener SV; Stoller ML; Boscardin J; Suskind AM
J Endourol; 2019 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 30458114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors influencing urologist treatment preference in surgical management of stone disease.
Childs MA; Rangel LJ; Lingeman JE; Krambeck AE
Urology; 2012 May; 79(5):996-1003. PubMed ID: 22245295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm.
Yao F; Jiang X; Xie B; Liu N
BMC Urol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):126. PubMed ID: 34517851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Matched pair analysis of ureteroscopy vs. shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper ureteric calculi.
Stewart GD; Bariol SV; Moussa SA; Smith G; Tolley DA
Int J Clin Pract; 2007 May; 61(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 17386062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Time Course and Risk Factors for Repeat Procedures After Ureteroscopy or Shockwave Lithotripsy.
Wong DG; Monda S; Vetter J; Lai H; Olsen MA; Keller M; Desai A
Urology; 2023 Apr; 174():42-47. PubMed ID: 36574909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
Salem HK
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of kidney stones in patients with a solitary kidney.
Yuruk E; Binbay M; Ozgor F; Sekerel L; Berberoglu Y; Muslumanoglu AY
J Endourol; 2015 Apr; 29(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 25268731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the risk of incident hypertension and chronic kidney disease after exposure to shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy.
Denburg MR; Jemielita TO; Tasian GE; Haynes K; Mucksavage P; Shults J; Copelovitch L
Kidney Int; 2016 Jan; 89(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 26509587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.
Pearle MS; Lingeman JE; Leveillee R; Kuo R; Preminger GM; Nadler RB; Macaluso J; Monga M; Kumar U; Dushinski J; Albala DM; Wolf JS; Assimos D; Fabrizio M; Munch LC; Nakada SY; Auge B; Honey J; Ogan K; Pattaras J; McDougall EM; Averch TD; Turk T; Pietrow P; Watkins S
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2005-9. PubMed ID: 15879805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. No Wound for Stones <2 cm in Horseshoe Kidney: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.
Chen H; Chen G; Pan Y; Zhu Y; Xiong C; Chen H; Yang Z
Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):249-255. PubMed ID: 31096234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.
Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Regional Variation in Shock Wave Lithotripsy Utilization Among Medicare Patients with Nephrolithiasis.
Rezaee ME; Tundo GN; Goodney PP; Pais VM
Urology; 2019 Nov; 133():103-108. PubMed ID: 31377258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for ureteral calculi: a prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes.
Park J; Shin DW; Chung JH; Lee SW
World J Urol; 2013 Dec; 31(6):1569-74. PubMed ID: 23076422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial.
Dasgupta R; Cameron S; Aucott L; MacLennan G; Thomas RE; Kilonzo MM; Lam TBL; N'Dow J; Norrie J; Anson K; Burgess N; Clark CT; Keeley FX; MacLennan SJ; Starr K; McClinton S
Eur Urol; 2021 Jul; 80(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 33810921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantification of preoperative stone burden for ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy: current state and future recommendations.
Patel SR; Nakada SY
Urology; 2011 Aug; 78(2):282-5. PubMed ID: 21296390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
