These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36206673)

  • 1. Validation of a moving base driving simulator for motion sickness research.
    Talsma TMW; Hassanain O; Happee R; de Winkel KN
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103897. PubMed ID: 36206673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moving base driving simulators' potential for carsickness research.
    Kuiper OX; Bos JE; Diels C; Cammaerts K
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102889. PubMed ID: 31422261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the Participant-Related Determinants of Simulator Sickness in a Physical Motion Car Rollover Simulation as Measured by the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire.
    Rzeźniczek P; Lipiak A; Bilski B; Laudańska-Krzemińska I; Cybulski M; Chawłowska E
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 32993081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can We Study Autonomous Driving Comfort in Moving-Base Driving Simulators? A Validation Study.
    Bellem H; Klüver M; Schrauf M; Schöner HP; Hecht H; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):442-456. PubMed ID: 28005453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of simulated fog and motion on simulator sickness in a driving simulator and the duration of after-effects.
    Dziuda L; Biernacki MP; Baran PM; Truszczyński OE
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):406-12. PubMed ID: 23726466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of adaptation to reduce simulator sickness in driving assessment and research.
    Domeyer JE; Cassavaugh ND; Backs RW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Apr; 53():127-32. PubMed ID: 23416680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mood and simulator sickness after truck simulator exposure.
    Biernacki MP; Dziuda L
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2014 Apr; 27(2):278-92. PubMed ID: 24692072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrogastrography in Autonomous Vehicles-An Objective Method for Assessment of Motion Sickness in Simulated Driving Environments.
    Gruden T; Popović NB; Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Miljković N; Tomažič S; Sodnik J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33466805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motion sickness in passenger vehicles during test track operations.
    Jones MLH; Le VC; Ebert SM; Sienko KH; Reed MP; Sayer JR
    Ergonomics; 2019 Oct; 62(10):1357-1371. PubMed ID: 31282785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transition to manual: Comparing simulator with on-road control transitions.
    Eriksson A; Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():227-234. PubMed ID: 28342410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies.
    Brooks JO; Goodenough RR; Crisler MC; Klein ND; Alley RL; Koon BL; Logan WC; Ogle JH; Tyrrell RA; Wills RF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 20380904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relating individual motion sickness levels to subjective discomfort ratings.
    de Winkel KN; Irmak T; Kotian V; Pool DM; Happee R
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Apr; 240(4):1231-1240. PubMed ID: 35192043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do mental workload and presence experienced when driving a real car predispose drivers to simulator sickness? An exploratory study.
    Milleville-Pennel I; Charron C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():192-202. PubMed ID: 25463960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel method for reducing motion sickness susceptibility through training visuospatial ability - A two-part study.
    Smyth J; Jennings P; Bennett P; Birrell S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103264. PubMed ID: 32920224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Visually Induced Motion Sickness on Emergency Braking Reaction Times in a Driving Simulator.
    Reinhard R; Tutulmaz E; Rutrecht HM; Hengstenberg P; Geissler B; Hecht H; Muttray A
    Hum Factors; 2019 Sep; 61(6):1004-1018. PubMed ID: 30860903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dropout during a driving simulator study: A survival analysis.
    Matas NA; Nettelbeck T; Burns NR
    J Safety Res; 2015 Dec; 55():159-69. PubMed ID: 26683559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the utility of EDA and skin temperature as individual physiological correlates of motion sickness.
    Smyth J; Birrell S; Woodman R; Jennings P
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Apr; 92():103315. PubMed ID: 33276213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optical correction reduces simulator sickness in a driving environment.
    Bridgeman B; Blaesi S; Campusano R
    Hum Factors; 2014 Dec; 56(8):1472-81. PubMed ID: 25509825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-driving carsickness.
    Diels C; Bos JE
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt B():374-82. PubMed ID: 26446454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.