194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36207136)
1. Response Monitoring in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study Comparing
Vogsen M; Harbo F; Jakobsen NM; Nissen HJ; Dahlsgaard-Wallenius SE; Gerke O; Jensen JD; Asmussen JT; Jylling AMB; Braad PE; Vach W; Ewertz M; Hildebrandt MG
J Nucl Med; 2023 Mar; 64(3):355-361. PubMed ID: 36207136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 2-[
Vogsen M; Naghavi-Behzad M; Harbo FG; Jakobsen NM; Gerke O; Asmussen JT; Nissen HJ; Dahlsgaard-Wallenius SE; Braad PE; Jensen JD; Ewertz M; Hildebrandt MG
Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):5552. PubMed ID: 37019987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT for monitoring therapy response in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Riedl CC; Pinker K; Ulaner GA; Ong LT; Baltzer P; Jochelson MS; McArthur HL; Gönen M; Dickler M; Weber WA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Aug; 44(9):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 28462446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A role of FDG-PET/CT for response evaluation in metastatic breast cancer?
Hildebrandt MG; Naghavi-Behzad M; Vogsen M
Semin Nucl Med; 2022 Sep; 52(5):520-530. PubMed ID: 35525631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using positron emission tomography (PET) response criteria in solid tumours (PERCIST) 1.0 for evaluation of 2'-deoxy-2'-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose-PET/CT scans to predict survival early during treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Fledelius J; Khalil AA; Hjorthaug K; Frøkiaer J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 26678718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The utility of
Kitajima K; Kawanaka Y; Komoto H; Minami T; Yokoi T; Kuribayashi K; Kijima T; Nakamura A; Hashimoto M; Kondo N; Hasegawa S; Yamakado K
Hell J Nucl Med; 2021; 24(3):186-198. PubMed ID: 34901959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.
Skougaard K; Nielsen D; Jensen BV; Hendel HW
J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23572497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective comparison of early interim
Su TP; Huang JS; Chang PH; Lui KW; Hsieh JC; Ng SH; Chan SC
BMC Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(1):908. PubMed ID: 34376155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole-body
Gajjala SR; Hulikal N; Kadiyala S; Kottu R; Kalawat T
Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 29923514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy using 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with melanoma.
Amrane K; Le Goupil D; Quere G; Delcroix O; Gouva S; Schick U; Salaun PY; Abgral R; Alavi Z; Keromnes N; Querellou S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jul; 98(29):e16417. PubMed ID: 31335691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of 2-[
Naghavi-Behzad M; Gerke O; Kodahl AR; Vogsen M; Asmussen JT; Weber W; Hildebrandt MG; Kidholm K
Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):16315. PubMed ID: 37770525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of RECIST, EORTC criteria and PERCIST for evaluation of early response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Shang J; Ling X; Zhang L; Tang Y; Xiao Z; Cheng Y; Guo B; Gong J; Huang L; Xu H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Oct; 43(11):1945-53. PubMed ID: 27236466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Value of
Hynninen J; Laasik M; Vallius T; Kemppainen J; Grönroos S; Virtanen J; Casado J; Hautaniemi S; Grenman S; Seppänen M; Auranen A
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2018 Aug; 30(8):507-514. PubMed ID: 29753662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FDG-PET/CT Versus Contrast-Enhanced CT for Response Evaluation in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Helland F; Hallin Henriksen M; Gerke O; Vogsen M; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Hildebrandt MG
Diagnostics (Basel); 2019 Aug; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 31461923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
Kirchner J; Hatzoglou V; Buthorn JB; Bossert D; Sigler AM; Reiner AS; Ulaner GA; Diamond EL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1154-1165. PubMed ID: 33057928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison Between
Rossi G; Bauckneht M; Genova C; Rijavec E; Biello F; Mennella S; Dal Bello MG; Cittadini G; Bruzzi P; Piva R; Ceriani V; Sambuceti G; Lopci E; Morbelli S; Grossi F
J Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 61(7):990-998. PubMed ID: 31806768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3'-Deoxy-3'-
Kim JE; Chae SY; Kim JH; Kim HJ; Kim TW; Kim KP; Kim SY; Lee JL; Oh SJ; Kim JS; Ryu JS; Moon DH; Hong YS
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(8):1713-1722. PubMed ID: 31041456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response monitoring in metastatic breast cancer: a comparison of survival times between FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT.
Naghavi-Behzad M; Vogsen M; Vester RM; Olsen MMB; Oltmann H; Braad PE; Asmussen JT; Gerke O; Vach W; Kidholm K; Kodahl AR; Weber W; Hildebrandt MG
Br J Cancer; 2022 May; 126(9):1271-1279. PubMed ID: 35013575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Impact That Number of Analyzed Metastatic Breast Cancer Lesions Has on Response Assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT Using PERCIST.
Pinker K; Riedl CC; Ong L; Jochelson M; Ulaner GA; McArthur H; Dickler M; Gönen M; Weber WA
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1102-4. PubMed ID: 26985059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Predictive Value of FDG PET/CT for Determining Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Stage III-IV BRAF -Mutated Melanoma Patients Treated With Targeted Therapy-What Can Be Learned From Progression?
van der Hiel B; Aalbersberg EA; van den Eertwegh AJM; de Wit-van der Veen LJ; Stokkel MPM; Lopez-Yurda M; Boellaard R; Kapiteijn EW; Hospers GAP; Aarts MJB; de Vos FYFL; Boers-Sonderen MJ; van der Veldt AAM; de Groot JWB; Haanen JBAG
Clin Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 49(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 38113329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
