These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36207273)

  • 1. Interobserver Variability Between Expert, Experienced, and Novice Operator Affects Interpretation of Optical Coherence Tomography and 20 MHz Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging.
    Martin WG; McNaughton E; Bambrough PB; West NEJ; Hoole SP
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Feb; 47():33-39. PubMed ID: 36207273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct Comparison of Virtual-Histology Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging for Identification of Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma.
    Brown AJ; Obaid DR; Costopoulos C; Parker RA; Calvert PA; Teng Z; Hoole SP; West NE; Goddard M; Bennett MR
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 8(10):e003487. PubMed ID: 26429760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Plaque characteristics of thin-cap fibroatheroma evaluated by OCT and IVUS.
    Miyamoto Y; Okura H; Kume T; Kawamoto T; Neishi Y; Hayashida A; Yamada R; Imai K; Saito K; Yoshida K
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jun; 4(6):638-46. PubMed ID: 21679899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multimodality imaging of attenuated plaque using grayscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherent tomography.
    Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Han S; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 88(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 25511369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discordance in the diagnostic assessment of vulnerable plaques between radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography among patients with acute myocardial infarction: insights from the IBIS-4 study.
    Ueki Y; Yamaji K; Losdat S; Karagiannis A; Taniwaki M; Roffi M; Otsuka T; Koskinas KC; Holmvang L; Maldonado R; Pedrazzini G; Radu MD; Dijkstra J; Windecker S; Garcia-Garcia HM; Räber L
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Oct; 37(10):2839-2847. PubMed ID: 34236570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical coherence tomography imaging of coronary atherosclerosis is affected by intraobserver and interobserver variability.
    Brown AJ; Jaworski C; Corrigan JP; de Silva R; Bennett MR; Mahmoudi M; Hoole SP; West NE
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2016 May; 17(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 26406395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of coronary thin-cap fibroatheroma by intravascular ultrasound-based machine learning.
    Bae Y; Kang SJ; Kim G; Lee JG; Min HS; Cho H; Kang DY; Lee PH; Ahn JM; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
    Atherosclerosis; 2019 Sep; 288():168-174. PubMed ID: 31130215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of coronary lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaque progression and regression.
    Xie Z; Tian J; Ma L; Du H; Dong N; Hou J; He J; Dai J; Liu X; Pan H; Liu Y; Yu B
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 16(12):1374-80. PubMed ID: 25911116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First in-human evaluation of a novel intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography system for intracoronary imaging.
    Akl E; Pinilla-Echeverri N; Garcia-Garcia HM; Mehta SR; Dan K; Kuku KO; Courtney BK; Sheth T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):686-698. PubMed ID: 34792273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
    Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of combined use of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis and optical coherence tomography for detecting thin-cap fibroatheroma.
    Sawada T; Shite J; Garcia-Garcia HM; Shinke T; Watanabe S; Otake H; Matsumoto D; Tanino Y; Ogasawara D; Kawamori H; Kato H; Miyoshi N; Yokoyama M; Serruys PW; Hirata K
    Eur Heart J; 2008 May; 29(9):1136-46. PubMed ID: 18397871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined NIRS and IVUS imaging detects vulnerable plaque using a single catheter system: a head-to-head comparison with OCT.
    Roleder T; Kovacic JC; Ali Z; Sharma R; Cristea E; Moreno P; Sharma SK; Narula J; Kini AS
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Jul; 10(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24769522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography-defined anatomic severity and hemodynamic severity assessed by coronary physiologic indices.
    Lee JM; Choi KH; Koo BK; Zhang J; Han JK; Yang HM; Park KW; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Gwon HC; Kim HS
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2020 Oct; 73(10):812-821. PubMed ID: 31812517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
    Tu S; Xu L; Ligthart J; Xu B; Witberg K; Sun Z; Koning G; Reiber JH; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 28(6):1315-27. PubMed ID: 22261998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
    Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo coronary lesion differentiation with computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound as compared to optical coherence tomography.
    Wieringa WG; Lexis CP; Lipsic E; van der Werf HW; Burgerhof JG; Hagens VE; Bartels GL; Broersen A; Schurer RA; Tan ES; van der Harst P; van den Heuvel AF; Willems TP; Pundziute G
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 28169175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of OCT, grayscale IVUS, and their combination for the diagnosis of coronary TCFA: an ex vivo validation study.
    Fujii K; Hao H; Shibuya M; Imanaka T; Fukunaga M; Miki K; Tamaru H; Sawada H; Naito Y; Ohyanagi M; Hirota S; Masuyama T
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Apr; 8(4):451-460. PubMed ID: 25797121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agreement and reproducibility of gray-scale intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography for the analysis of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold.
    Gómez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Diletti R; Gogas BD; Farooq V; Onuma Y; Gobbens P; Van Es GA; García-García HM; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 May; 79(6):890-902. PubMed ID: 21523891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.