132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3620757)
1. Recommended procedure for Rinne and Weber tuning-fork tests. British Society of Audiology.
Br J Audiol; 1987 Aug; 21(3):229-30. PubMed ID: 3620757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommended procedure for Rinne and Weber tuning fork tests.
Hinchcliffe R
Br J Audiol; 1988 May; 22(2):153. PubMed ID: 3390630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests].
Ziemer C
MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of the Weber and Rinne tuning fork tests in evaluation of children with otitis media with effusion.
Behn A; Westerberg BD; Zhang H; Riding KH; Ludemann JP; Kozak FK
J Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 17942032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Rinne tuning fork test.
Swan IR
Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1989 Sep; 24(9A):99-102. PubMed ID: 2506208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity and specificity of Rinne tuning fork test.
Thijs C; Leffers P
BMJ; 1989 Jan; 298(6668):255. PubMed ID: 2493884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal.
Chole RA; Cook GB
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Apr; 114(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 3348896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity and specificity of Rinne tuning fork test.
Browning GG; Swan IR
BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1381-2. PubMed ID: 3146371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical accuracy of tuning fork tests.
Stankiewicz JA; Mowry HJ
Laryngoscope; 1979 Dec; 89(12):1956-63. PubMed ID: 513917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. C1-tuning fork tests in school-aged children.
Haapaniemi JJ; Suonpää JT; Salmivalli AJ; Virolainen ES
Auris Nasus Larynx; 1996; 23():26-32. PubMed ID: 8809320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test.
Burkey JM; Lippy WH; Schuring AG; Rizer FM
Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9455950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks.
MacKechnie CA; Greenberg JJ; Gerkin RC; McCall AA; Hirsch BE; Durrant JD; Raz Y
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 24085711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The importance of tuning forks].
Reiss M; Reiss G
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2002 Jan; 91(1-2):17-9. PubMed ID: 11824141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The tuning fork--an essential instrument in otologic practice.
Doyle PJ; Anderson DW; Pijl S
J Otolaryngol; 1984 Apr; 13(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6726852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss.
Miltenburg DM
J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined tuning fork tests in hearing loss: explorative clinical study of the patterns.
Vikram KB; Naseeruddin K
J Otolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 33(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15903203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Physical diagnostic procedures: whispered speech and tuning fork test].
Grote JJ; de Laat JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(32):1816-9. PubMed ID: 9856153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Tuning-fork tests--outdated?].
Reiss M
Fortschr Med; 1999 Apr; 117(12):18-20. PubMed ID: 10361362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Smartphone-Based Weber Test May Discriminate between a Conductive and a Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Ungar OJ; Handzel O; Cavel O; Oron Y
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(4):191-196. PubMed ID: 31480043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Value of preliminary hearing tests].
Reiss M; Reiss G
Wien Med Wochenschr; 2003; 153(3-4):73-5. PubMed ID: 12658966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
