These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. A new modification of the Rinne test. Johnston DF Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1992 Aug; 17(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 1526051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic Accuracy of Tuning Fork Tests for Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review. Kelly EA; Li B; Adams ME Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Aug; 159(2):220-230. PubMed ID: 29661046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hearing loss. A plan for individualized management. Ruckenstein MJ Postgrad Med; 1995 Oct; 98(4):197-200, 203, 206 passim. PubMed ID: 7567720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of a smartphone-based Rinne test to detect an air-bone gap. Hibscher D; Oron Y; Handzel O; Warshavsky A; Horowitz G; Ungar OJ Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 278(12):4767-4773. PubMed ID: 33454812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does this patient have hearing impairment? Bagai A; Thavendiranathan P; Detsky AS JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(4):416-28. PubMed ID: 16434632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic Accuracy of Parallel vs Perpendicular Orientation of the Tuning Fork in the Identification of Conductive Hearing Loss. Butskiy O; Nunez DA JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Mar; 144(3):275-276. PubMed ID: 29392285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of the Bing and Rinne tuning fork tests. Wilson WR; Woods LA Arch Otolaryngol; 1975 Feb; 101(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 1092293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is there still a role for tuning-fork tests? Browning GG Br J Audiol; 1987 Aug; 21(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 3620750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The otologist's tuning fork examination--are you striking it correctly? Stevens JR; Pfannenstiel TJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Mar; 152(3):477-9. PubMed ID: 25475500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Investigating sudden hearing loss in adults. Fishman JM; Cullen L BMJ; 2018 Nov; 363():k4347. PubMed ID: 30420423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Tuning-fork tests in diagnosis of serous otitis media. Yung MW; Morris TM Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Dec; 283(6306):1576. PubMed ID: 6796173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Rinne test: does the tuning fork position affect the sound amplitude at the ear? Butskiy O; Ng D; Hodgson M; Nunez DA J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 45():21. PubMed ID: 27013057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Can Rinne's test quantify hearing loss? Jacob V; Alexander P; Nalinesha KM; Nayar RC Ear Nose Throat J; 1993 Feb; 72(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 8482257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The early descriptions of the so-called tuning fork tests of Weber and Rinne. I. The "Weber test" and its first description by Schmalz. Huizing EH ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1973; 35(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 4584086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Tuning fork tests in children (an evaluation of their usefulness). Capper JW; Slack RW; Maw AR J Laryngol Otol; 1987 Aug; 101(8):780-3. PubMed ID: 3655529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical precision of the Rinne test. Gelfand SA Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 83(5-6):480-7. PubMed ID: 888683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [History of the tuning fork. II: Evolution of the classical experiments by Weber, Rinne and Schwabach]. Feldmann H Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):318-26. PubMed ID: 9280421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]