These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36207664)

  • 21. Suppression of a salient distractor protects the processing of target features.
    Narhi-Martinez W; Dube B; Chen J; Leber AB; Golomb JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 37528277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Global enhancement of target color-not proactive suppression-explains attentional deployment during visual search.
    Oxner M; Martinovic J; Forschack N; Lempe R; Gundlach C; Müller M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jun; 152(6):1705-1722. PubMed ID: 37023328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation.
    Yantis S; Jonides J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 2137514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds.
    Mounts JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1485-93. PubMed ID: 11143458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Probing early attention following negative and positive templates.
    Zhang Z; Gapelin N; Carlisle NB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1166-1175. PubMed ID: 31650519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evidence that proactive distractor suppression does not require attentional resources.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Tolomeo D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; 31(3):1376-1386. PubMed ID: 38049572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
    Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets.
    Juola JF; Koshino H; Warner CB
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Apr; 57(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 7770324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The interaction between memorized objects and abrupt onsets in oculomotor capture.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1768-79. PubMed ID: 21533921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual load modulates attentional capture by abrupt onsets.
    Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):404-10. PubMed ID: 19293114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.
    Leber AB; Gwinn RE; Hong Y; O'Toole RJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1873-1881. PubMed ID: 27225635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence for early top-down modulation of attention to salient visual cues through probe detection.
    Burnham BR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1003-1023. PubMed ID: 31432340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal task-sets override attentional capture by rare cues.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):681-692. PubMed ID: 29154636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hidden from view: Statistical learning exposes latent attentional capture.
    Hilchey MD; Pratt J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1633-1640. PubMed ID: 31152432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. No identification of abrupt onsets that capture attention: evidence against a unified model of spatial attention.
    Maxwell JW; Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jul; 85(5):2119-2135. PubMed ID: 32500242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The attractiveness of salient distractors to reaching movements is task dependent.
    Nissens T; Fiehler K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2502-2515. PubMed ID: 32026449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.