These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36207666)

  • 1. Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):457-470. PubMed ID: 36207666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breaking through the attentional window: capture by abrupt onsets versus color singletons.
    Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Lien MC; Jung K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1461-74. PubMed ID: 22806409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28752665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.
    Leber AB; Egeth HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 16724780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual grouping allows for attention to cover noncontiguous locations and suppress capture from nearby locations.
    Kerzel D; Born S; Schönhammer J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1362-70. PubMed ID: 22428670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shattering the Attentional Window: What Really Determines Capture by Abrupt Onsets and Color Singletons?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E
    J Cogn; 2023; 6(1):36. PubMed ID: 37426058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search.
    Horstmann G
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 12430832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
    Theeuwes J; Burger R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons.
    Belopolsky AV; Zwaan L; Theeuwes J; Kramer AF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):934-8. PubMed ID: 18087962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct roles of theta and alpha oscillations in the process of contingent attentional capture.
    Zhong C; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2023; 17():1220562. PubMed ID: 37609570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overriding auditory attentional capture.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 17557587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
    Berry JH
    Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search.
    Lamy D; Carmel T; Egeth HE; Leber AB
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Aug; 68(6):919-32. PubMed ID: 17153188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.