174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36208315)
1. Morbidity and risk factors for complications of inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer.
Jeanne-Julien A; Bouchot O; De Vergie S; Branchereau J; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Rigaud J
World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 36208315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contemporary inguinal lymph node dissection: minimizing complications.
Spiess PE; Hernandez MS; Pettaway CA
World J Urol; 2009 Apr; 27(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 18762945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wound Complication Rates after Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Contemporary Analysis of the NSQIP Database.
Chua KJ; Balraj V; Patel HV; Srivastava A; Doppalapudi SK; Elsamra SE; Jang TL; Singer EA; Ghodoussipour SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2023 Jan; 236(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 36519902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective study comparing video-endoscopic radical inguinal lymph node dissection (VEILND) with open radical ILND (OILND) for penile cancer over an 8-year period.
Kumar V; Sethia KK
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):530-534. PubMed ID: 27628265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current practice patterns of society of urologic oncology members in performing inguinal lymph node staging/therapy for penile cancer: A survey study.
Marilin N; Master VA; Pettaway CA; Spiess PE
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):439.e9-439.e15. PubMed ID: 33775532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-port robotic inguinal lymph node dissection: A safe and feasible option for penile cancer.
Patel AS; Isharwal S
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101633. PubMed ID: 34332496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.
Heyns CF; Fleshner N; Sangar V; Schlenker B; Yuvaraja TB; van Poppel H
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. PubMed ID: 20691885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inguinal lymph node dissection in the era of minimally invasive surgical technology.
Nabavizadeh R; Petrinec B; Nabavizadeh B; Singh A; Rawal S; Master V
Urol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 32855056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome.
Yao K; Tu H; Li YH; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Zhou FJ; Han H
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):546-52. PubMed ID: 20620415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Update in the surgical principles and therapeutic outcomes of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer.
Ercole CE; Pow-Sang JM; Spiess PE
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 21481617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.
Protzel C; Alcaraz A; Horenblas S; Pizzocaro G; Zlotta A; Hakenberg OW
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1075-88. PubMed ID: 19264390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term oncological results in penile cancer treated by inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Jeanne-Julien A; Bouchot O; De Vergie S; Branchereau J; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Rigaud J
World J Urol; 2023 Jun; 41(6):1589-1595. PubMed ID: 37039906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of clinical feasibility and oncological outcomes between video endoscopic and open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hu J; Li H; Cui Y; Liu P; Zhou X; Liu L; Chen H; Chen J; Zu X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(22):e15862. PubMed ID: 31145338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes following radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer using a fascial-sparing surgical technique.
Schifano N; Fallara G; Rezvani S; Pozzi E; Churchill J; Castiglione F; Rewhorn M; Hadway P; Nigam R; Rees R; Sangar V; Lau M; Parnham A; Alnajjar H; Muneer A
World J Urol; 2023 Jun; 41(6):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 37019998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma.
Ravi R
Br J Urol; 1993 Dec; 72(6):941-5. PubMed ID: 8306161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients?
Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Silva MN; Molina WR; Forseto PH; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
J Endourol; 2008 Aug; 22(8):1687-91. PubMed ID: 18657031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early wound complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: a historical cohort study and risk-factor analysis.
Stuiver MM; Djajadiningrat RS; Graafland NM; Vincent AD; Lucas C; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2013 Sep; 64(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 23490726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical templates for inguinal lymph node dissection in cN0 penile cancer: A comparative study.
Bakshi GK; Pal M; Jain DK; Arora A; Tamhankar A; Maitre P; Murthy V; J A; Agrawal A; Menon S; Joshi A; Spiess PE; Prakash GJ
Urol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 41(9):393.e9-393.e16. PubMed ID: 37507285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma.
Bouchot O; Rigaud J; Maillet F; Hetet JF; Karam G
Eur Urol; 2004 Jun; 45(6):761-5; discussion 765-6. PubMed ID: 15149749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) versus Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) in carcinoma of penis: Comparison of perioperative outcomes, complications and oncological outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Patel KN; Salunke A; Bakshi G; Jayaprakash D; Pandya SJ
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):112.e11-112.e22. PubMed ID: 34895995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
