197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36208365)
1. Is single tract jejunal interposition better than double tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy?
Lu S; Ma F; Yang W; Peng L; Hua Y
Updates Surg; 2023 Jan; 75(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 36208365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical study on two reconstruction methods of proximal gastrectomy and piggyback jejunal interposition for Siewert Ⅱ or Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
Xu N; Dong JH; Zhang WH; Tao K; Huang QX; Li ZG; Zong L
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 57(2):114-118. PubMed ID: 30704214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of reconstruction techniques after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shaibu Z; Chen Z; Mzee SAS; Theophilus A; Danbala IA
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jul; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 32677956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life of reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li B; Wang Y; Li B; Shan F; Li Z
BMC Cancer; 2024 Jan; 24(1):56. PubMed ID: 38200411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of quality-of-life after proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction versus gastric tube reconstruction in patients with proximal gastric cancer].
Gao HF; Tao L; Bao LS; Wang F; Liu S; Lu XF; Wang M
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Dec; 26(12):1162-1170. PubMed ID: 38110278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative nutritional outcomes and quality of life-related complications of proximal versus total gastrectomy for upper-third early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
Lee I; Oh Y; Park SH; Kwon Y; Park S
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21460. PubMed ID: 33293604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xiang R; Song W; Ren J; Lu W; Zhang H; Fu T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Nov; 100(45):e27818. PubMed ID: 34766595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Efficacy of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for early upper gastric cancer].
Qiu GL; Wei C; Zhu MK; Han SN; Li XW; Wang HJ; Wang PX; Liu JH; Zhou HY; Liao XH; Che XM; Fan L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 25(5):412-420. PubMed ID: 35599396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Double tract reconstruction improves the quality of life and better maintain the BMI of patients with proximal gastric cancer.
Wang ZJ; Xu ZY; Huang ZJ; Li L; Guan D; Gao YH; Wang XX
BMC Surg; 2024 May; 24(1):171. PubMed ID: 38822305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Outcomes of Proximal Gastrectomy versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhao L; Ling R; Chen J; Shi A; Chai C; Ma F; Zhao D; Chen Y
Dig Surg; 2021; 38(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 33152740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Roux-en-Y anastomosis and jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy.
Liu YH; Meng R; Zhu B; Zhan QQ; Yang X; Ding GY; Jia CL; Xu WG
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 37098553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique and double-tract reconstruction for proximal early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
Huang QZ; Wang PC; Chen YX; Lin S; Ye K
Updates Surg; 2023 Dec; 75(8):2117-2126. PubMed ID: 37728858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-Term Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction: A Matched-Cohort Study.
Wang L; Xia Y; Jiang T; Li F; Wang W; Zhang D; Xu H; Yang L; Xu Z
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():292-299. PubMed ID: 31630013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A comparison between the double-flap technique and jejunal interposition.
Kumamoto T; Sasako M; Ishida Y; Kurahashi Y; Shinohara H
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0247636. PubMed ID: 33626086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Safety and efficacy of proximal gastrectomy with double tract anastomosis reconstruction for upper gastric cancer: a meta-ananlysis].
Du Y; Zhang JN; Li WP; Wang Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jan; 25(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 35067037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three digestive tract reconstruction methods for the treatment of Siewert II and III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a prospective, randomized controlled study.
Li Z; Dong J; Huang Q; Zhang W; Tao K
World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 17(1):209. PubMed ID: 31810484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double tract reconstruction versus double flap technique: short-term clinical outcomes after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.
Yu B; Park KB; Park JY; Lee SS; Kwon OK; Chung HY; Hwang YJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jul; 36(7):5243-5256. PubMed ID: 34997340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison on the Efficacy of Double Tract Gastric Interposition Reconstruction Versus Jejunal Interposition Reconstruction After Proximal Gastrectomy.
Yue C; Peng R; Wei W; Zhou B; Wen X; Gu R; Ming X; Li G; Chen H
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Jul; 26():e922504. PubMed ID: 32624566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study.
Xu Z; Chen J; Chen S; Lin H; Zhao K; Zheng C; Liu H; Chen Z; Fu Y; Hong Q; Lin W; Yan S; You J
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1137836. PubMed ID: 37333809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of clinical efficacy between proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for proximal gastric cancer].
Fan JY; Qian F; Liu JJ; Liu JY; Wu B; Wu YX; Yu PW
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):767-773. PubMed ID: 31422616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
