133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36208526)
1. Comparison of CT and MRI for contouring active bone marrow in bone marrow sparing IMRT of carcinoma cervix and its effects on functional outcomes.
Sajeevan S; Singh P; Krishnan A; Singh S; Gupta S; Sharma P; Pasricha R; Joseph D; Narayan ML; Gupta M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Nov; 278():189-194. PubMed ID: 36208526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acute hematological toxicity during post-operative bowel sparing image-guided intensity modulated radiation with concurrent cisplatin.
Lewis S; Chopra S; Naga P; Pant S; Dandpani E; Bharadwaj N; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gupta S; Shrivastava S
Br J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 91(1092):20180005. PubMed ID: 30179056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Analysis of VMAT and IMRT Techniques: Evaluation of Dose Constraints and Bone Marrow Sparing in Cervical Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy.
Thakur N; Kaur H; Kaur S; Lehal P; Sudan M; Jain N; Sharma R; Sharma A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 Jan; 25(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 38285777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlations Between Radiation Dose in Bone Marrow and Hematological Toxicity in Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Comparison of 3DCRT, IMRT, and RapidARC.
Chang Y; Yang ZY; Li GL; Li Q; Yang Q; Fan JQ; Zhao YC; Song YQ; Wu G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 May; 26(4):770-6. PubMed ID: 26844613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 2 contouring methods of bone marrow on CT and correlation with hematological toxicities in non-bone marrow-sparing pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin for cervical cancer.
Mahantshetty U; Krishnatry R; Chaudhari S; Kanaujia A; Engineer R; Chopra S; Shrivastava S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1427-34. PubMed ID: 22932264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity of intensity-modulated and three-dimensional radiotherapy in patients with cervix carcinoma: A randomized prospective study.
Naik A; Gurjar OP; Gupta KL; Singh K; Nag P; Bhandari V
Cancer Radiother; 2016 Jul; 20(5):370-6. PubMed ID: 27368915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective study of functional bone marrow-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for pelvic malignancies.
Liang Y; Bydder M; Yashar CM; Rose BS; Cornell M; Hoh CK; Lawson JD; Einck J; Saenz C; Fanta P; Mundt AJ; Bydder GM; Mell LK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):406-14. PubMed ID: 22687195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy: comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Hui B; Zhang Y; Shi F; Wang J; Wang T; Wang J; Yuan W; Li Y; Liu Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Nov; 24(9):1648-52. PubMed ID: 25275663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bone marrow sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in carcinoma of anal canal: a prospective study.
Rattan R; Kapoor R; Bahl A; Gupta R; Oinam AS; Kaur S
Ann Transl Med; 2016 Feb; 4(4):70. PubMed ID: 27004217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of hematologic toxicity between 3DCRT and IMRT planning in cervical cancer patients after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a national multi-center study.
Erpolat OP; Alco G; Caglar HB; Igdem S; Saran A; Dagoglu N; Aslay I; Ozsaran Z; Demirci S; Keven E; Guney Y; Akmansu M; Kilic D; Bayman E; Etiz D; Mandel NM
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 24654465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective dosimetric and clinical comparison of acute hematological toxicities in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy in carcinoma cervix.
Avinash HU; Arul Ponni TR; Janaki MG; Kirthi Koushik AS; Kumar SM
J Cancer Res Ther; 2015; 11(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 25879342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of bone marrow irradiation dose on acute haematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Chen M; Wang D; Bao Z; Yi Z; Mei Z; Sun S; Xiang Q; Yang C; Yang H; Qiu H; Xie C
Radiat Oncol; 2023 Apr; 18(1):66. PubMed ID: 37031167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [(18)F]FDG-PET standard uptake value as a metabolic predictor of bone marrow response to radiation: impact on acute and late hematological toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation therapy.
Elicin O; Callaway S; Prior JO; Bourhis J; Ozsahin M; Herrera FG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec; 90(5):1099-107. PubMed ID: 25442041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by MR functional imaging.
Qin X; Gong G; Wang L; Su Y; Yin Y
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Dec; 17(1):207. PubMed ID: 36517839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose to specific subregions of pelvic bone marrow defined with FDG-PET as a predictor of hematologic nadirs during concomitant chemoradiation in anal cancer patients.
Franco P; Arcadipane F; Ragona R; Lesca A; Gallio E; Mistrangelo M; Cassoni P; Arena V; Bustreo S; Faletti R; Rondi N; Morino M; Ricardi U
Med Oncol; 2016 Jul; 33(7):72. PubMed ID: 27277756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of dosimetric data of bone marrow between standard IMRT and bone marrow sparing IMRT in carcinoma cervix.
Pattanayak L; Mohanta S; Panda S; Mohapatra M
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2021; 26(6):976-983. PubMed ID: 34992871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric correlation of bone marrow irradiation with acute hematological toxicity in concurrent chemoradiation of cervical carcinoma patients.
Pruthi DS; Nagpal P; Pandey M; Singh H
Indian J Cancer; 2023; 60(3):432-438. PubMed ID: 36861701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A dosimetric analysis of tomotherapy based intensity modulated radiation therapy with and without bone marrow sparing in gynecologic malignancies.
Platta CS; Bayliss A; McHaffie D; Tome WA; Straub MR; Bradley KA
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Feb; 12(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 22974331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized study for dosimetric assessment and clinical impact of bone marrow sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy on hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities in cervical cancer.
Kapoor AR; Bhalavat RL; Chandra M; Pareek V; Moosa Z; Markana S; Nandakumar P; Bauskar P; Shincy NV
J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(6):1490-1497. PubMed ID: 36412399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tomotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer might increase bone marrow toxicity in comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Wang Y; Xiao Q; Zeng B; Ni Q; Liu X; Liu X; Tian L; Sheng C; Peng L; Wang H
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):e6-e12. PubMed ID: 31176536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
