These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36209128)
1. Historical and projected public spending on drugs for rare diseases in Canada between 2010 and 2025. Lech R; Chow G; Mann K; Mott P; Malmberg C; Forte L Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Oct; 17(1):371. PubMed ID: 36209128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey. Polisena J; Burgess M; Mitton C; Lynd LD BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 May; 17(1):372. PubMed ID: 28549479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits? Rawson NSB Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Jun; 17(1):218. PubMed ID: 35698235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pharmaceutical expenditure on drugs for rare diseases in Canada: a historical (2007-13) and prospective (2014-18) MIDAS sales data analysis. Divino V; DeKoven M; Kleinrock M; Wade RL; Kim T; Kaura S Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 May; 11(1):68. PubMed ID: 27207271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. HTA decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: comparison of processes across countries. Stafinski T; Glennie J; Young A; Menon D Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Jul; 17(1):258. PubMed ID: 35804398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alignment of health technology assessments and price negotiations for new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: Does it lead to improved patient access? Rawson NSB J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol; 2020 Feb; 27(1):e48-e64. PubMed ID: 32124580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reimbursement of Drugs for Rare Diseases through the Public Healthcare System in Canada: Where Are We Now? Menon D; Clark D; Stafinski T Healthc Policy; 2015 Aug; 11(1):15-32. PubMed ID: 26571466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health technology assessment of drugs for rare diseases: insights, trends, and reasons for negative recommendations from the CADTH common drug review. Janoudi G; Amegatse W; McIntosh B; Sehgal C; Richter T Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 Dec; 11(1):164. PubMed ID: 27908281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A National Approach to Reimbursement Decision-Making on Drugs for Rare Diseases in Canada? Insights from Across the Ponds. Short H; Stafinski T; Menon D Healthc Policy; 2015 May; 10(4):24-46. PubMed ID: 26142357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors associated with positive and negative recommendations for cancer and non-cancer drugs for rare diseases in Canada. Nagase FNI; Stafinski T; Sun J; Jhangri G; Menon D Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2019 Jun; 14(1):127. PubMed ID: 31174574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Specific, Fair and Transparent: A Canadian Process for Funding Drugs for Rare Diseases. Stevenson H Healthc Pap; 2023 Jan; 21(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 36692913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An international comparative analysis of public reimbursement of orphan drugs in Canadian provinces compared to European countries. Ward LM; Chambers A; Mechichi E; Wong-Rieger D; Campbell C Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Mar; 17(1):113. PubMed ID: 35246200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of the copayment reduction system on accessibility to orphan drugs in South Korea. Hwang SE; Kim M; Hong Y; Lee D; Kim T; Park J; Bae J; Lee JH Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2023 Jun; 23(5):519-525. PubMed ID: 36922505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orphan Drug Expenditures In The United States: A Historical And Prospective Analysis, 2007-18. Divino V; DeKoven M; Kleinrock M; Wade RL; Kaura S Health Aff (Millwood); 2016 Sep; 35(9):1588-94. PubMed ID: 27605637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulatory approval and public drug plan listing of new drugs for rare disorders in Canada and New Zealand. Rawson NSB J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol; 2020 Jun; 27(2):e58-e67. PubMed ID: 32543163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Global spending on orphan drugs in France, Germany, the UK, Italy and Spain during 2007. Orofino J; Soto J; Casado MA; Oyagüez I Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(5):301-15. PubMed ID: 20804223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe: 2010 - 2020. Schey C; Milanova T; Hutchings A Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2011 Sep; 6():62. PubMed ID: 21951518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do Reimbursement Recommendations by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health Translate Into Coverage Decisions for Orphan Drugs in the Canadian Province of Ontario? Fontrier AM; Kanavos P Value Health; 2023 Jul; 26(7):1011-1021. PubMed ID: 36889379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Twelve years' experience with direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs in Canada: a cautionary tale. Mintzes B; Morgan S; Wright JM PLoS One; 2009 May; 4(5):e5699. PubMed ID: 19479084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical imperatives of timely access to orphan drugs: is possible to reconcile economic incentives and patients' health needs? Rodriguez-Monguio R; Spargo T; Seoane-Vazquez E Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2017 Jan; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 28057032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]