These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36210273)

  • 1. Comparison of embryo implantation potential between time-lapse incubators and standard incubators: a randomized controlled study.
    Zhang XD; Zhang Q; Han W; Liu WW; Shen XL; Yao GD; Shi SL; Hu LL; Wang SS; Wang JX; Zhou JJ; Kang WW; Zhang HD; Luo C; Yu Q; Liu RZ; Sun YP; Sun HX; Wang XH; Quan S; Huang GN
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Nov; 45(5):858-866. PubMed ID: 36210273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No benefit of culturing embryos in a closed system compared with a conventional incubator in terms of number of good quality embryos: results from an RCT.
    Park H; Bergh C; Selleskog U; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Lundin K
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 25432920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Live birth rate following undisturbed embryo culture at low oxygen in a time-lapse incubator compared to a high-quality benchtop incubator.
    Kalleas D; McEvoy K; Horne G; Roberts SA; Brison DR
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2022 Feb; 25(1):147-153. PubMed ID: 32098536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cumulative live birth rates and perinatal outcomes with the use of time-lapse imaging incubators for embryo culture: a retrospective cohort study of 1882 ART cycles.
    Mascarenhas M; Fox SJ; Thompson K; Balen AH
    BJOG; 2019 Jan; 126(2):280-286. PubMed ID: 29443441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of fragmented embryos implantation potential using time-lapse technology.
    Lahav-Baratz S; Blais I; Koifman M; Dirnfeld M; Oron G
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jun; 49(6):1560-1570. PubMed ID: 36959087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of human embryo cultivation in a classic CO2 incubator with 20% oxygen versus benchtop incubator with 5% oxygen on live births: the randomized prospective trial.
    Gelo N; Kirinec G; Baldani DP; Vrčić H; Ježek D; Milošević M; Stanić P
    Zygote; 2019 Jun; 27(3):131-136. PubMed ID: 31072414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pregnancy rates of day 4 and day 5 embryos after culture in an integrated time-lapse incubator.
    Holschbach V; Weigert J; Dietrich JE; Roesner S; Montag M; Strowitzki T; Toth B
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 May; 15(1):37. PubMed ID: 28482910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blastocyst development in single medium with or without renewal on day 3: a prospective cohort study on sibling donor oocytes in a time-lapse incubator.
    Costa-Borges N; Bellés M; Meseguer M; Galliano D; Ballesteros A; Calderón G
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):707-713. PubMed ID: 26690010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator.
    Kirkegaard K; Hindkjaer JJ; Grøndahl ML; Kesmodel US; Ingerslev HJ
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2012 Jun; 29(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 22460082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth?
    Barberet J; Bruno C; Valot E; Antunes-Nunes C; Jonval L; Chammas J; Choux C; Ginod P; Sagot P; Soudry-Faure A; Fauque P
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 31287145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized controlled trial comparing embryo culture in two incubator systems: G185 K-System versus EmbryoScope.
    Barberet J; Chammas J; Bruno C; Valot E; Vuillemin C; Jonval L; Choux C; Sagot P; Soudry A; Fauque P
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):302-309.e1. PubMed ID: 29175066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.
    Armstrong S; Bhide P; Jordan V; Pacey A; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 May; 5(5):CD011320. PubMed ID: 29800485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Embryo incubation by time-lapse systems versus conventional incubators in Chinese women with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing IVF/ICSI: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Chen M; Wu Y; Huang X; Li W; Sun C; Meng Z; Ai A; Hong L; Tang C; Li K; Fu Y; Chen Z; Kong P; Guo Y; Liu W; Mol BW; Teng X
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e038657. PubMed ID: 33191252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.
    Armstrong S; Bhide P; Jordan V; Pacey A; Marjoribanks J; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 May; 5(5):CD011320. PubMed ID: 31140578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized study of G-TL and global media for blastocyst culture in the EmbryoScope: morphokinetics, pregnancy, and live births after single-embryo transfer.
    Desai N; Yao M; Richards EG; Goldberg JM
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 32861442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sibling oocytes cultured in a time-lapse versus benchtop incubator: how time-lapse incubators improve blastocyst development and euploid rate.
    Nobrega NG; Abdala A; El-Damen A; Arnanz A; Bayram A; Elkhatib I; Lawrenz B; Fatemi H; De Munck N
    Zygote; 2023 Aug; 31(4):402-409. PubMed ID: 37226769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope.
    Rubio I; Galán A; Larreategui Z; Ayerdi F; Bellver J; Herrero J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1287-1294.e5. PubMed ID: 25217875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Group Embryo Culture under Low-Oxygen Tension in Benchtop Incubators on Human Embryo Culture: Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Ruíz M; Santamaría-López E; Blasco V; Hernáez MJ; Caligara C; Pellicer A; Fernández-Sánchez M; Prados N
    Reprod Sci; 2020 Jul; 27(7):1522-1533. PubMed ID: 31994003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Embryo and Clinical Outcomes in Different Types of Incubator Between Two Different Embryo Culture Systems.
    Ueno S; Ito M; Shimazaki K; Okimura T; Uchiyama K; Yabuuchi A; Kato K
    Reprod Sci; 2021 Aug; 28(8):2301-2309. PubMed ID: 33751461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
    Yang L; Cai S; Zhang S; Kong X; Gu Y; Lu C; Dai J; Gong F; Lu G; Lin G
    Hum Reprod; 2018 May; 33(5):869-876. PubMed ID: 29546361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.