These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36210295)
1. Top 100 Urology Influencers on Twitter: Is Social Media Influence Associated with Academic Impact? Corsi N; Nguyen DD; Butaney M; Majdalany SE; Corsi MP; Malchow T; Piontkowski AJ; Trinh QD; Loeb S; Abdollah F Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Mar; 9(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 36210295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Who should you be following? The top 100 social media influencers in orthopaedic surgery. Varady NH; Chandawarkar AA; Kernkamp WA; Gans I World J Orthop; 2019 Sep; 10(9):327-338. PubMed ID: 31572669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Top 100 Social Media Influencers in Plastic Surgery on Twitter: Who Should You Be Following? Chandawarkar AA; Gould DJ; Grant Stevens W Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Jul; 38(8):913-917. PubMed ID: 29518179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. #Botox 101: Subgroup Analysis of Twitter's Top 101 Neurotoxin Influencers. Zajac J; Chandawarkar A; Sherber N Dermatol Surg; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1474-1479. PubMed ID: 34608089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The top 100 Twitter influencers in cardiology. Kesiena O; Onyeaka HK; Fugar S; Okoh AK; Volgman AS AIMS Public Health; 2021; 8(4):743-753. PubMed ID: 34786432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. #OtoTwitter: The Top 75 Twitter Influencers in Otolaryngology and Association With Academic Impact. Miller A; Patro A; Stevens MN; Scott Fortune D; Gelbard A; Haynes DS; Topf MC Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jun; 170(6):1676-1683. PubMed ID: 38494744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics of General Surgery Social Media Influencers on Twitter. Elson NC; Le DT; Johnson MD; Reyna C; Shaughnessy EA; Goodman MD; Lewis JD Am Surg; 2021 Mar; 87(3):492-498. PubMed ID: 33054321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inflammatory Bowel Disease and X (Formerly Twitter) Influencers: Who Are They and What Do They Say? Garg A; Sohal A; Kalra S; Singh C; Singh I; Grewal J; Kansal R; Malhotra K; Mahajan R; Midha V; Singh A; Sood A; Bawa A Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e47536. PubMed ID: 38022053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To Bot or Not? Challenging the Top Social Media Influencers in #PlasticSurgery. Fan KL; Economides JM; Song DH Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan; 143(1):337-343. PubMed ID: 30589813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Twitter and academic Urology in the United States and Canada: a comprehensive assessment of the Twitterverse in 2019. Chandrasekar T; Goldberg H; Klaassen Z; Wallis CJD; Leong JY; Liem S; Teplitsky S; Noorani R; Loeb S BJU Int; 2020 Jan; 125(1):173-181. PubMed ID: 31602782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re: Nicholas Corsi, David-Dan Nguyen, Mohit Butaney, et al. Top 100 Urology Influencers on Twitter: Is Social Media Influence Associated with Academic Impact? Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.009: Hirsch versus Kardashian: Assessing Discrepancies in Social Media Influence Versus Productivity and Citation Impact of Urological Influencers. Albersen M; Roussel E Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Mar; 9(2):384-387. PubMed ID: 36336581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of Urology Related Twitter Traffic Activity through a Standardized List of Social Media Communication Descriptors. Borgmann H; Katz MS; Catto J; Weight C; Kutikov A Urol Pract; 2017 Jul; 4(4):349-354. PubMed ID: 37592632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Activity, content, contributors, and influencers of the twitter discussion on urologic oncology. Borgmann H; Loeb S; Salem J; Thomas C; Haferkamp A; Murphy DG; Tsaur I Urol Oncol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):377-83. PubMed ID: 27036217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Twitter Use among Academic Urology Programs. Farber NJ; Koprowski CJ; Modi PK; Wang W; Dubin JM; Kwon YS; Elsamra SE Urol Pract; 2017 May; 4(3):269-274. PubMed ID: 37592670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Online and social media presence of Australian and New Zealand urologists. Davies N; Murphy DG; van Rij S; Woo HH; Lawrentschuk N BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):984-9. PubMed ID: 25906813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infertility influencers: an analysis of information and influence in the fertility webspace. Blakemore JK; Bayer AH; Smith MB; Grifo JA J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Jun; 37(6):1371-1378. PubMed ID: 32382959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceived Role of Social Media in Urologic Knowledge Acquisition Among Young Urologists: A European Survey. Rivas JG; Socarras MR; Patruno G; Uvin P; Esperto F; Dinis PJ; Roupret M; Borgmann H Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):768-773. PubMed ID: 28753825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterizing Twitter Influencers in Radiation Oncology. Valle LF; Chu FI; Smith M; Wang C; Lee P; Moghanaki D; Chino FL; Steinberg ML; Raldow AC Adv Radiat Oncol; 2022; 7(6):100919. PubMed ID: 35694034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The top sports medicine influencers on X (formerly Twitter). Howard C; McIntire R; Anderson JM; Stewart C; McIntosh H; Cornwell J; Barron K J Sports Sci; 2023 Sep; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 37722817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]