73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36210654)
1. Influence of microhabitat, fecundity, and parental care on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in Caribbean Eleutherodactylus frogs.
Dugo-Cota A; Vilà C; Rodríguez A; Gonzalez-Voyer A
Evolution; 2022 Dec; 76(12):3041-3053. PubMed ID: 36210654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Function-related Drivers of Skull Morphometric Variation and Sexual Size Dimorphism in a Subterranean Rodent, Plateau Zokor (
Su J; Hegab IM; Ji W; Nan Z
Ecol Evol; 2018 May; 8(9):4631-4643. PubMed ID: 29760903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revisiting niche divergence hypothesis in sexually dimorphic birds: Is diet overlap correlated with sexual size dimorphism?
Bravo C; Bautista-Sopelana LM; Alonso JC
J Anim Ecol; 2024 Apr; 93(4):460-474. PubMed ID: 38462717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds.
Székely T; Freckleton RP; Reynolds JD
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Aug; 101(33):12224-7. PubMed ID: 15304645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of miniaturization on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in geckos.
Glynne E; Adams DC
Evolution; 2024 Jul; 78(7):1275-1286. PubMed ID: 38577944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. It is not always about body size: evidence of Rensch's rule in a male weapon.
Machado G; Buzatto BA; Samia DSM
Biol Lett; 2021 Jun; 17(6):20210234. PubMed ID: 34157237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual size dimorphism.
Corcobado G; Rodríguez-Gironés MA; De Mas E; Moya-Laraño J
BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 10():236. PubMed ID: 20682029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The origins and drivers of sexual size dimorphism in sharks.
Gayford JH; Sternes PC
Ecol Evol; 2024 Mar; 14(3):e11163. PubMed ID: 38500855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diversification dynamics in Caribbean rain frogs (
Jiménez-Ortega D; Valente L; Dugo-Cota Á; Rabosky DL; Vilà C; Gonzalez-Voyer A
Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 290(1990):20222171. PubMed ID: 36629104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism in the most widely ranging lizard: testing the effects of reproductive mode and climate.
Roitberg ES; Orlova VF; Bulakhova NA; Kuranova VN; Eplanova GV; Zinenko OI; Arribas O; Kratochvíl L; Ljubisavljević K; Starikov VP; Strijbosch H; Hofmann S; Leontyeva OA; Böhme W
Ecol Evol; 2020 Jun; 10(11):4531-4561. PubMed ID: 32551042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual dimorphism in subterranean amphipod crustaceans covaries with subterranean habitat type.
Premate E; Fišer Ž; Biró A; Copilaş-Ciocianu D; Fromhage L; Jennions M; Borko Š; Herczeg G; Balázs G; Kralj-Fišer S; Fišer C
J Evol Biol; 2024 May; 37(5):487-500. PubMed ID: 38483086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selection for predation, not female fecundity, explains sexual size dimorphism in the orchid mantises.
Svenson GJ; Brannoch SK; Rodrigues HM; O'Hanlon JC; Wieland F
Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():37753. PubMed ID: 27905469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrasting selection pressure on body and weapon size in a polygynous megaherbivore.
Shannon G; Sadler P; Smith J; Roylance-Casson E; Cordes LS
Biol Lett; 2021 Oct; 17(10):20210368. PubMed ID: 34610251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphological variability or inter-observer bias? A methodological toolkit to improve data quality of multi-researcher datasets for the analysis of morphological variation.
Schüßler D; Blanco MB; Guthrie NK; Sgarlata GM; Dammhahn M; Ernest R; Evasoa MR; Hasiniaina A; Hending D; Jan F; le Pors B; Miller A; Olivieri G; Rakotonanahary AN; Rakotondranary SJ; Rakotondravony R; Ralantoharijaona T; Ramananjato V; Randrianambinina B; Raoelinjanakolona NN; Rasoazanabary E; Rasoloarison RM; Rasolofoson DW; Rasoloharijaona S; Rasolondraibe E; Roberts SH; Teixeira H; van Elst T; Johnson SE; Ganzhorn JU; Chikhi L; Kappeler PM; Louis EE; Salmona J; Radespiel U
Am J Biol Anthropol; 2024 Jan; 183(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 37607125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Skin Microbiota of
Garcia-Recinos L; Burrowes PA; Dominguez-Bello M
Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():2571. PubMed ID: 31781069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New estimates indicate that males are not larger than females in most mammal species.
Tombak KJ; Hex SBSW; Rubenstein DI
Nat Commun; 2024 Mar; 15(1):1872. PubMed ID: 38472185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ontogenic differences in sexual size dimorphism across four plover populations.
Dos Remedios N; Székely T; Küpper C; Lee PL; Kosztolányi A
Ibis (Lond 1859); 2015 Jul; 157(3):590-600. PubMed ID: 27499551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variation of life-history traits of the Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis in relation to temperature and geographical latitude.
Xiao L; He HM; Huang LL; Geng T; Fu S; Xue FS
Ecol Evol; 2016 Aug; 6(15):5129-43. PubMed ID: 27551371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of parental care and egg size: a comparative analysis in frogs.
Summers K; Sea McKeon C; Heying H
Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Mar; 273(1587):687-92. PubMed ID: 16608687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eleutherodactylus frogs show frequency but no temporal partitioning: implications for the acoustic niche hypothesis.
Villanueva-Rivera LJ
PeerJ; 2014; 2():e496. PubMed ID: 25101228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
