147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36211320)
1. Agreement between swept-source optical biometry and Scheimpflug-based tomography in eyes with previous myopic refractive surgery.
Karmiris E; Gartaganis PS; Ntravalias T; Manousakis E; Giannakis I; Chalkiadaki E
Saudi J Ophthalmol; 2022; 36(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 36211320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement in anterior segment measurements between swept-source and Scheimpflug-based optical biometries in keratoconic eyes: a pilot study.
Chalkiadaki E; Gartaganis PS; Ntravalias T; Giannakis I; Manousakis E; Karmiris E
Ther Adv Ophthalmol; 2022; 14():25158414211063283. PubMed ID: 35387236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Agreement Between Swept-Source Optical Biometry and Scheimpflug-based Topography Measurements of Anterior Segment Parameters.
Özyol P; Özyol E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 169():73-78. PubMed ID: 27320057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer.
Dehnavi Z; Khabazkhoob M; Mirzajani A; Jabbarvand M; Yekta A; Jafarzadehpur E
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2015; 22(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 25949084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total and simulated keratometry measurements using IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL after small incision lenticule extraction.
Liu Q; Yang W; Li D; Wang Z; Chen W; Zhai C; Wei W
Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Jun; 44(1):237. PubMed ID: 38902457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of total corneal power measurements obtained with different devices after myopic keratorefractive surgery.
Wang ZY; Song YZ; Yang WL; Liu Q; Li YF; Cui R; Shen L; Zhai CB
Int J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(7):1117-1122. PubMed ID: 37465503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of refractive outcomes using Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry or IOLMaster 700 keratometry for IOL power calculation.
Aksoy M; Asena L; Güngör SG; Küçüködük A; Akman A
Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):2205-2212. PubMed ID: 33733281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of toric intraocular lens power calculation depending on different keratometry values using a novel network based software platform.
Ramsauer M; Luft N; Vounotrypidis E; Priglinger SG; Mayer WJ
Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1363286. PubMed ID: 38665295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.
Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.
Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X
Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy on agreement of anterior segment variables obtained by a swept-source biometer vs a Scheimpflug-based tomographer.
Salouti R; Kamalipour A; Masihpour N; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti K; Nowroozzadeh MH
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1229-1235. PubMed ID: 32483074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameters Between Schiempflug Topography and Swept-Source Optic Coherence Based Optic Biometry in Keratoconus and Healthy Subjects.
Güçlü H; Akaray İ; Kaya S; Sattarpanah S; Çınar AC; Sakallıoğlu K; Korkmaz S; Gürlü V
Eye Contact Lens; 2021 Oct; 47(10):539-545. PubMed ID: 33813587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of refractive outcomes obtained with two swept-source OCT-based optical biometers after cataract surgery: A study of 152 eyes.
Agard E; Levron A; Billant J; Douma I; Dot C
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2024 Jun; 47(6):104186. PubMed ID: 38663226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2677-2682. PubMed ID: 31486917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery.
Tang Q; Hoffer KJ; Olson MD; Miller KM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 19545808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation and comparison of a novel Scheimpflug-based optical biometer with standard partial coherence interferometry for biometry and intraocular lens power calculation.
Wang Z; Yang W; Li D; Chen W; Zhao Q; Li Y; Cui R; Shen L; Xian J
Exp Ther Med; 2021 Apr; 21(4):326. PubMed ID: 33732299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining corneal power using Pentacam after myopic photorefractive keratectomy.
Falavarjani KG; Hashemi M; Joshaghani M; Azadi P; Ghaempanah MJ; Aghai GH
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 38(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 20491804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the accuracy of four Pentacam corneal astigmatism values in non-toric pseudophakic eyes.
Zheng T; Xu J; Lu Y
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 258(4):795-803. PubMed ID: 31900645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ray-tracing Calculation Using Scheimpflug Tomography of Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus IOLs Following Myopic LASIK.
Lwowski C; Van Keer K; Adas M; Schwarz L; Hinzelmann L; Pawlowicz K; Kohnen T
J Refract Surg; 2021 Apr; 37(4):231-239. PubMed ID: 34038658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
