These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3621336)

  • 1. Comparison of visual estimate with digital caliper measurement of coronary artery stenosis.
    Schweiger MJ; Stanek E; Iwakoshi K; Hafer JG; Jacob A; Tullner W; Gianelly RE
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1987; 13(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 3621336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital quantification eliminates intraobserver and interobserver variability in the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis.
    Vas R; Eigler N; Miyazono C; Pfaff JM; Resser KJ; Weiss M; Nivatpumin T; Whiting J; Forrester J
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Nov; 56(12):718-23. PubMed ID: 4061294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements.
    Scoblionko DP; Brown BG; Mitten S; Caldwell JH; Kennedy JW; Bolson EL; Dodge HT
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Mar; 53(6):689-93. PubMed ID: 6702614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Videodensitometry versus digital calipers for quantitative coronary angiography.
    Theron HD; Lambert CR; Pepine CJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Nov; 66(17):1186-90. PubMed ID: 2239720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital subtraction coronary angiography using high-pass temporal filtration: a comparison with cineangiography.
    Bray BE; Anderson FL; Hardin CW; Kruger RA; Sutton RB; Nelson JA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985; 11(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3884167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of automated quantitative coronary angiography with caliper measurements of percent diameter stenosis.
    Kalbfleisch SJ; McGillem MJ; Pinto IM; Kavanaugh KM; DeBoe SF; Mancini GB
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 May; 65(18):1181-4. PubMed ID: 2337026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of coronary angioplasty: comparison of visual assessment, hand-held caliper measurement and automated digital quantitation.
    Katritsis D; Lythall DA; Cooper IC; Crowther A; Webb-Peploe MM
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 15(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 2976306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography.
    Fleming RM; Kirkeeide RL; Smalling RW; Gould KL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Oct; 18(4):945-51. PubMed ID: 1894868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of digital and cine coronary arteriography.
    Gurley JC; Nissen SE
    Int J Card Imaging; 1990; 5(2-3):105-18. PubMed ID: 2230289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of electronic digital calipers compared with quantitative angiography in measuring coronary arterial diameter.
    Uehata A; Matsuguchi T; Bittl JA; Orav J; Meredith IT; Anderson TJ; Selwyn AP; Ganz P; Yeung AC
    Circulation; 1993 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):1724-9. PubMed ID: 8403318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inability of caliper measurement to enhance observer agreement in the interpretation of coronary cineangiograms.
    Holder DA; Johnson AL; Stolberg HO; Campbell M; Gunstensen J; Joyal M; Roberts R; Biagioni EM; Vaughan W; Romeo M
    Can J Cardiol; 1985 Jan; 1(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 3850759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variability in measurement of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis as displayed by both digital subtraction and magnetic resonance angiography: an assessment of three caliper techniques and visual impression of stenosis.
    Young GR; Humphrey PR; Nixon TE; Smith ET
    Stroke; 1996 Mar; 27(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 8610315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection and quantitation of coronary artery stenoses from digital subtraction angiograms compared with 35-millimeter film cineangiograms.
    Tobis J; Nalcioglu O; Iseri L; Johnston WD; Roeck W; Castleman E; Bauer B; Montelli S; Henry WL
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Sep; 54(6):489-96. PubMed ID: 6383001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity.
    Rigolin VH; Robiolio PA; Spero LA; Harrawood BP; Morris KG; Fortin DF; Baker WA; Bashore TM; Cusma JT
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Jul; 78(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 8712131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography.
    Zir LM; Miller SW; Dinsmore RE; Gilbert JP; Harthorne JW
    Circulation; 1976 Apr; 53(4):627-32. PubMed ID: 1253383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. The Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators.
    Folland ED; Vogel RA; Hartigan P; Bates ER; Beauman GJ; Fortin T; Boucher C; Parisi AF
    Circulation; 1994 May; 89(5):2005-14. PubMed ID: 8181124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of measurements of coronary narrowings by videodensitometry and by digital calipers.
    Balkin J; Rosenmann D; Ilan M; Zion MM
    Cardiology; 1992; 81(4-5):238-44. PubMed ID: 1301249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?
    White CW; Wright CB; Doty DB; Hiratza LF; Eastham CL; Harrison DG; Marcus ML
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Mar; 310(13):819-24. PubMed ID: 6700670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of observer and videodensitometric measurements of simulated coronary artery stenoses.
    Simons MA; Bastian BV; Bray BE; Dedrickson DR
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):562-8. PubMed ID: 3305413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual versus quantitative assessment of the severity of coronary artery stenoses: can the angiographer's eye be reeducated?
    Danchin N; Juillière Y; Foley D; Serruys PW
    Am Heart J; 1993 Sep; 126(3 Pt 1):594-600. PubMed ID: 8362714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.