These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3621336)

  • 21. [Progression of coronary sclerosis. Studies in 19 patients over a 6-year period using quantitative coronary angiography].
    Nellessen U; Rafflenbeul W; Hecker H; Lichtlen P
    Z Kardiol; 1984 Dec; 73(12):760-7. PubMed ID: 6523975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Variation in measurement of coronary lesions on 35 and 70 mm angiograms.
    Myers MG; Shulman HS; Saibil EA; Naqvi SZ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 May; 130(5):913-15. PubMed ID: 417590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
    Sanz ML; Mancini J; LeFree MT; Mickelson JK; Starling MR; Vogel RA; Topol EJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1987 Jul; 60(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 2955693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual interpretation compared with caliper and computerized measurements in experimental vessel stenosis.
    Yanagihara Y; Sugahara T; Fukunishi Y
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):542-5. PubMed ID: 1449877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of coronary artery stenoses by digital subtraction angiography: a pathoanatomic validation.
    Klein LW; Agarwal JB; Rosenberg MC; Stets G; Weintraub WS; Schneider RM; Hermann G; Helfant RH
    Am Heart J; 1987 Apr; 113(4):1011-7. PubMed ID: 3551569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Second reading of coronary angiograms by radiologists.
    Birnbaum LM; Filion KB; Joyal D; Eisenberg MJ
    Can J Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 22(14):1217-2221. PubMed ID: 17151771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy and interobserver variability of coronary cineangiography: a comparison with postmortem evaluation.
    Trask N; Califf RM; Conley MJ; Kong Y; Peter R; Lee KL; Hackel DB; Wagner GS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 May; 3(5):1145-54. PubMed ID: 6707366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative analysis of 1.5-T whole-heart coronary MR angiograms obtained with 32-channel cardiac coils: a comparison with conventional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Yonezawa M; Nagata M; Kitagawa K; Kato S; Yoon Y; Nakajima H; Nakamori S; Sakuma H; Hatakenaka M; Honda H
    Radiology; 2014 May; 271(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 24475794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lesion length assessment using a new vessel caliper.
    Wolyn R; Dixon SR; Almany SL; Korotko J; Huang RR; O'Neill WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Feb; 58(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 12552538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of the vasomotility of epicardial coronary arteries with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Jost S; Rafflenbeul W; Lichtlen P
    Z Kardiol; 1989; 78 Suppl 6():143-8. PubMed ID: 2694662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interobserver variability in the measurement of internal carotid stenosis.
    Chow V; Burbridge B; Friedland R; Kudel B; Chappell B; Tan L
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Feb; 50(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10047749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of operator- and patient-dependent variables on the suitability of automated quantitative coronary arteriography for routine clinical use.
    Gurley JC; Nissen SE; Booth DC; DeMaria AN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 May; 19(6):1237-43. PubMed ID: 1564224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Definition and measurement of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: implications for clinical trials.
    Lespérance J; Bourassa MG; Schwartz L; Hudon G; Laurier J; Eastwood C; Kazim F
    Am Heart J; 1993 May; 125(5 Pt 1):1394-408. PubMed ID: 8480594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase I: The effect of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography.
    Kerensky RA; Cusma JT; Kubilis P; Simon R; Bashore TM; Hirshfeld JW; Holmes DR; Pepine CJ; Nissen SE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 35(5):1370-9. PubMed ID: 10758987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of coronary angioplasty by an automated digital angiographic method.
    Katritsis D; Lythall DA; Anderson MH; Cooper IC; Webb-Peploe MW
    Am Heart J; 1988 Nov; 116(5 Pt 1):1181-7. PubMed ID: 2973213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase I. The effects of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography.
    Kerensky RA; Cusma JT; Kubilis P; Simon R; Bashore TM; Hirshfeld JW; Holmes DR; Pepine CJ; Nissen SE
    Eur Heart J; 2000 Apr; 21(8):668-78. PubMed ID: 10731405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of simultaneously performed digital and film-based angiography in assessment of coronary artery disease.
    Gurley JC; Nissen SE; Booth DC; Harrison M; Grayburn P; Elion JL; DeMaria AN
    Circulation; 1988 Dec; 78(6):1411-20. PubMed ID: 3191595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The significance of improved angiocardiography systems in the quantitative assessment of proximal coronary stenosis. Comparison of angiographic and hemodynamic measurements in vivo].
    Bonzel T; Wollschläger H; Gick M; Löllgen H; Just H
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr Suppl; 1984; 16():77-81. PubMed ID: 6588554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
    Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA
    Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Variability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms by different specialists based on data from the cooperative Coronary Artery Surgery Study].
    Kemp H; Davis K; Judkins MP; Gosselin A; Kennedy JW; Cameron A; Swaye PS; Maynard C; Fisher LD
    Kardiologiia; 1982 Feb; 22(2):37-42. PubMed ID: 7069987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.