339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36213938)
1. Optimization of methacrylated gelatin /layered double hydroxides nanocomposite cell-laden hydrogel bioinks with high printability for 3D extrusion bioprinting.
Alarçin E; İzbudak B; Yüce Erarslan E; Domingo S; Tutar R; Titi K; Kocaaga B; Guner FS; Bal-Öztürk A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2023 Feb; 111(2):209-223. PubMed ID: 36213938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Printability and bio-functionality of a shear thinning methacrylated xanthan-gelatin composite bioink.
Garcia-Cruz MR; Postma A; Frith JE; Meagher L
Biofabrication; 2021 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33662950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of LDHs nanoparticles on the cellular behavior of stem cell-laden 3D-bioprinted scaffold.
İzbudak B; Bal-Öztürk A
J Biomater Appl; 2022 Jul; 37(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 35452304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages of photo-curable collagen-based cell-laden bioinks compared to methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) in digital light processing (DLP) and extrusion bioprinting.
Shi H; Li Y; Xu K; Yin J
Mater Today Bio; 2023 Dec; 23():100799. PubMed ID: 37766893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct 3D Bioprinting of Tough and Antifatigue Cell-Laden Constructs Enabled by a Self-Healing Hydrogel Bioink.
Liu Q; Yang J; Wang Y; Wu T; Liang Y; Deng K; Luan G; Chen Y; Huang Z; Yue K
Biomacromolecules; 2023 Jun; 24(6):2549-2562. PubMed ID: 37115848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Embedded 3D Bioprinting of Gelatin Methacryloyl-Based Constructs with Highly Tunable Structural Fidelity.
Ning L; Mehta R; Cao C; Theus A; Tomov M; Zhu N; Weeks ER; Bauser-Heaton H; Serpooshan V
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Oct; 12(40):44563-44577. PubMed ID: 32966746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D Bioprinting of Low-Concentration Cell-Laden Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) Bioinks with a Two-Step Cross-linking Strategy.
Yin J; Yan M; Wang Y; Fu J; Suo H
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2018 Feb; 10(8):6849-6857. PubMed ID: 29405059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Harnessing decellularised extracellular matrix microgels into modular bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting with good printability and high post-printing cell viability.
Chu H; Zhang K; Rao Z; Song P; Lin Z; Zhou J; Yang L; Quan D; Bai Y
Biomater Transl; 2023; 4(2):115-127. PubMed ID: 38283918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Mutreja I; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116198. PubMed ID: 34534709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells.
Ouyang L; Yao R; Zhao Y; Sun W
Biofabrication; 2016 Sep; 8(3):035020. PubMed ID: 27634915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. GelMA/bioactive silica nanocomposite bioinks for stem cell osteogenic differentiation.
Tavares MT; Gaspar VM; Monteiro MV; S Farinha JP; Baleizão C; Mano JF
Biofabrication; 2021 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33455952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tunable metacrylated silk fibroin-based hybrid bioinks for the bioprinting of tissue engineering scaffolds.
Yang J; Li Z; Li S; Zhang Q; Zhou X; He C
Biomater Sci; 2023 Feb; 11(5):1895-1909. PubMed ID: 36722864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach.
Gao T; Gillispie GJ; Copus JS; Pr AK; Seol YJ; Atala A; Yoo JJ; Lee SJ
Biofabrication; 2018 Jun; 10(3):034106. PubMed ID: 29923501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D Bioprinting of Methylcellulose/Gelatin-Methacryloyl (MC/GelMA) Bioink with High Shape Integrity.
Rastin H; Ormsby RT; Atkins GJ; Losic D
ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2020 Mar; 3(3):1815-1826. PubMed ID: 35021671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-Concentration Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogel with Tunable 3D Extrusion Printability and Cytocompatibility: Exploring Quantitative Process Science and Biophysical Properties.
Das S; Valoor R; Ratnayake P; Basu B
ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2024 May; 7(5):2809-2835. PubMed ID: 38602318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Addition of Laponite to gelatin methacryloyl bioinks improves the rheological properties and printability to create mechanically tailorable cell culture matrices.
Davern JW; Hipwood L; Bray LJ; Meinert C; Klein TJ
APL Bioeng; 2024 Mar; 8(1):016101. PubMed ID: 38204454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coaxial extrusion bioprinting of 3D microfibrous constructs with cell-favorable gelatin methacryloyl microenvironments.
Liu W; Zhong Z; Hu N; Zhou Y; Maggio L; Miri AK; Fragasso A; Jin X; Khademhosseini A; Zhang YS
Biofabrication; 2018 Jan; 10(2):024102. PubMed ID: 29176035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nanocomposite bioinks for 3D bioprinting.
Cai Y; Chang SY; Gan SW; Ma S; Lu WF; Yen CC
Acta Biomater; 2022 Oct; 151():45-69. PubMed ID: 35970479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Printing GelMA bioinks: a strategy for building
Fu Z; Hai N; Zhong Y; Sun W
Biofabrication; 2024 Mar; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 38447206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extrusion Bioprinting of Shear-Thinning Gelatin Methacryloyl Bioinks.
Liu W; Heinrich MA; Zhou Y; Akpek A; Hu N; Liu X; Guan X; Zhong Z; Jin X; Khademhosseini A; Zhang YS
Adv Healthc Mater; 2017 Jun; 6(12):. PubMed ID: 28464555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
