212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36215511)
1. A moral trade-off system produces intuitive judgments that are rational and coherent and strike a balance between conflicting moral values.
Guzmán RA; Barbato MT; Sznycer D; Cosmides L
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Oct; 119(42):e2214005119. PubMed ID: 36215511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moral dynamics: Grounding moral judgment in intuitive physics and intuitive psychology.
Sosa FA; Ullman T; Tenenbaum JB; Gershman SJ; Gerstenberg T
Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104890. PubMed ID: 34487974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment.
Kahane G; Wiech K; Shackel N; Farias M; Savulescu J; Tracey I
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 7(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 21421730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to weigh lives. A computational model of moral judgment in multiple-outcome structures.
Engelmann N; Waldmann MR
Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104910. PubMed ID: 34678683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas.
Bostyn DH; De Keersmaecker J; Van Assche J; Roets A
Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):392-397. PubMed ID: 31898259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Judging the morality of utilitarian actions: How poor utilitarian accessibility makes judges irrational.
Kusev P; van Schaik P; Alzahrani S; Lonigro S; Purser H
Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1961-1967. PubMed ID: 27119519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breakdown of utilitarian moral judgement after basolateral amygdala damage.
van Honk J; Terburg D; Montoya ER; Grafman J; Stein DJ; Morgan B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(31):e2119072119. PubMed ID: 35878039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Many heads are more utilitarian than one.
Keshmirian A; Deroy O; Bahrami B
Cognition; 2022 Mar; 220():104965. PubMed ID: 34872034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fickle Judgments in Moral Dilemmas: Time Pressure and Utilitarian Judgments in an Interdependent Culture.
Hashimoto H; Maeda K; Matsumura K
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():795732. PubMed ID: 35310271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling Morality in 3-D: Decision-Making, Judgment, and Inference.
Yu H; Siegel JZ; Crockett MJ
Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Apr; 11(2):409-432. PubMed ID: 31042018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Moral Hindsight.
Fleischhut N; Meder B; Gigerenzer G
Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 64(2):110-123. PubMed ID: 28497719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
Guglielmo S
Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():334-337. PubMed ID: 28803616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One strike and you're a lout: Cherished values increase the stringency of moral character attributions.
Rottman J; Foster-Hanson E; Bellersen S
Cognition; 2023 Oct; 239():105570. PubMed ID: 37536142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Manic patients exhibit more utilitarian moral judgments in comparison with euthymic bipolar and healthy persons.
Kim SH; Kim TY; Ryu V; Ha RY; Lee SJ; Ha K; Cho HS
Compr Psychiatry; 2015 Apr; 58():37-44. PubMed ID: 25598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good.
Kahane G; Everett JA; Earp BD; Farias M; Savulescu J
Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():193-209. PubMed ID: 25460392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Moral Judgments of Human vs. AI Agents in Moral Dilemmas.
Zhang Y; Wu J; Yu F; Xu L
Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36829410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of emotions for moral judgments depends on the type of emotion and moral scenario.
Ugazio G; Lamm C; Singer T
Emotion; 2012 Jun; 12(3):579-90. PubMed ID: 21859189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making.
Gawronski B; Armstrong J; Conway P; Friesdorf R; Hütter M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Sep; 113(3):343-376. PubMed ID: 28816493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Moral Judgments.
Malle BF
Annu Rev Psychol; 2021 Jan; 72():293-318. PubMed ID: 32886588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
