These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36216035)

  • 1. Optimizing twin sampling tube stabilization improves quantitative fit test results for flat-fold duckbill filtering facepiece respirators.
    Williams DL; Kave B; Bodas C; Begg F; Roberts M; Ng I
    Am J Infect Control; 2023 Jun; 51(6):694-698. PubMed ID: 36216035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized crossover study comparing quantitative fit tests between Trident™ and 3M™ Aura™ N95/P2 respirators.
    Williams DL; Kave B; Begg F; Bodas C; Ng I
    Infect Dis Health; 2022 May; 27(2):61-65. PubMed ID: 34799300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative fit-test concordance of a pair of similar-fit 3M Aura respirator models, 3M 9320A+ and 3M 1870+: A randomized crossover study.
    Williams DL; Kave B; Begg F; Bodas C; Ng I
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):291-294. PubMed ID: 35387701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.
    Hon CY; Danyluk Q; Bryce E; Janssen B; Neudorf M; Yassi A; Shen H; Astrakianakis G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Mar; 14(3):175-179. PubMed ID: 27717300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomised crossover trial of two flat-fold cup respirators: BYD DE2322 N95 versus Care Essentials MSK-002 P2.
    Bodas CR; Ng I; Kave B; Begg F; Williams DL
    Infect Dis Health; 2023 Feb; 28(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 36207250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a quantitative fit testing method for N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Janssen L; Luinenburg MD; Mullins HE; Danisch SG; Nelson TJ
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 12908863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subject validation of reusable N95 stop-gap filtering facepiece respirators in COVID-19 pandemic.
    Ng WCK; Mbadjeu Hondjeu AR; Syrett A; Caragata R; Rozenberg D; Xiao Z; Anwari V; Trac J; Mashari A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242304. PubMed ID: 33186406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. N95 filtering facepiece respirators do not reliably afford respiratory protection during chest compression: A simulation study.
    Hwang SY; Yoon H; Yoon A; Kim T; Lee G; Jung KY; Park JH; Shin TG; Cha WC; Sim MS; Kim S
    Am J Emerg Med; 2020 Jan; 38(1):12-17. PubMed ID: 30955924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the Fit of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators Fitted with an Ear Loop Strap System: A Pilot Study.
    Niu X; Koehler RH; Yermakov M; Grinshpun SA
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2023 Jan; 67(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 35924645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact on quantitative fit-test results after application of prophylactic hydrocolloid dressing under N95 respirators.
    Ng I; Kave B; Begg F; Sage S; Segal R; Williams DL
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 43(8):993-996. PubMed ID: 34269165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Fit for Sealed and Loose-Fitting Surgical Masks and N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.
    Karuppasamy K; Obuchowski N
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2021 May; 65(4):463-474. PubMed ID: 33458738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. N95 respirators: quantitative fit test pass rates and usability and comfort assessment by health care workers.
    Ng I; Kave B; Begg F; Bodas CR; Segal R; Williams D
    Med J Aust; 2022 Jul; 217(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 35645035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
    Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fit Characteristics of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators and the Accuracy of the User Seal Check among Koreans.
    Huh YJ; Jeong HM; Lim J; Park HY; Kim MY; Oh HS; Huh K
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):104-107. PubMed ID: 29345612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity and specificity of the user-seal-check in determining the fit of N95 respirators.
    Lam SC; Lee JK; Yau SY; Charm CY
    J Hosp Infect; 2011 Mar; 77(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 21236516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect on Fit of Multiple Consecutive Donning and Doffing of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.
    Vuma CD; Manganyi J; Wilson K; Rees D
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Oct; 63(8):930-936. PubMed ID: 31504129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two quantitative fit-test methods using N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Sietsema M; Brosseau LM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Aug; 13(8):621-7. PubMed ID: 26963561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
    Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.